'Although we are told all suggestions are forwarded to developers it appears like the first filter on suggestions is based on player size and if you're not in the top 10% your suggestion heads straight to the bin with no further thought/consideration..'
If true,that would be an explanation.
It is also in line with 'Come and preach to us when you have better stats'
As if having this imparts better credibility, in many cases the only reasons for better stats is having more money than sense,and time spent playing the game,or rather than saying 'cheating' should I say playing the system rather than the game.
Part of me doesn't understand why they keep trying to 'reinvent the wheel'
At the end of the day, no matter how they dress it up, kiilling troops is still killing troops.
They have already come up with ideas to engage with those that like to burn towns and kill troops and be the 'great big I am'.
Do they really get bored so quickly?
The inflation in the game would seem to serve no real purpose.
As has been said before, these types of games have a fatal flaw in them,'completion' and this is worsened by the pay to get to the end faster element .