We should first run a and election, a kind of votes see what others think, I am against it, and i am sure many areSnowgoon said:I'll pass that to devs.
Beacon Defense should ONLY be visible to the same ranks that can see League Stats - It only needs to be controlled with the same button.
No new code should be needed.
oracle said:
Alyona Kolomiitseva said:
We should first run a and election, a kind of votes see what others think, I am against it, and i am sure many areSnowgoon said:
I'll pass that to devs.Beacon Defense should ONLY be visible to the same ranks that can see League Stats - It only needs to be controlled with the same button.
No new code should be needed.
Perhaps you misunderstood my suggestion
League Stat visibility is controlled by the League Marshal. Some paranoid marshals only allow captains to see this info, but others allow all to see.
It should NOT be controlled by plarium, each league should choose. If you are against it then you can vote within your own league - no problem
First off, there people with more then one account that spend lots of money.
Second, two leagues would merge.
Third, good reason for all the heavy spenders to join one league.
Forth, game will fail.
Even if they would expand it to 300 it wouldnt be able to get there for a long time. It would be a problem tho but in a long term. To get up to 300 that means 150 new members . With 20 runes needed for each thats 150x20= 3000 runes. Players get runes on every 5 levels so thats 3000/5=600. So it will take 600 members to pass 5 levels to get on to it. Or if all the current members are above 60 it will take the league to pass 3000 levels to get it there. Not easy to do on a short time but in the long term it can get done and be a problem.
Actually, many leagues have players with many Runes of Fealty they have never applied. I am sure many leagues could easily come up with over 100 Runes overnight. The harder part is recruiting good players with all the time, effort and money already invested in leagues.Even if they would expand it to 300 it wouldnt be able to get there for a long time. It would be a problem tho but in a long term. To get up to 300 that means 150 new members . With 20 runes needed for each thats 150x20= 3000 runes. Players get runes on every 5 levels so thats 3000/5=600. So it will take 600 members to pass 5 levels to get on to it. Or if all the current members are above 60 it will take the league to pass 3000 levels to get it there. Not easy to do on a short time but in the long term it can get done and be a problem.
Yes and 100 runes are worth for what ..around 5 members more? And its not easy to get 100 runes every day ..once you reach the lvl 80 it takes lots of time or money to get up on those levels and while some can afford it not every member is ready to put that much so it will take a long time to get those there.Actually, many leagues have players with many Runes of Fealty they have never applied. I am sure many leagues could easily come up with over 100 Runes overnight. The harder part is recruiting good players with all the time, effort and money already invested in leagues.
the league that i am in has around 958 runes that would be an instant 47 new spots.. and if new people join that have runes and apply them league limit will go up even faster. but yes it woud still take a while to get another 100 spots (assuming that the limit is raised to 300)brunsonthomas said:Yes and 100 runes are worth for what ..around 5 members more? And its not easy to get 100 runes every day ..once you reach the lvl 80 it takes lots of time or money to get up on those levels and while some can afford it not every member is ready to put that much so it will take a long time to get those there.Actually, many leagues have players with many Runes of Fealty they have never applied. I am sure many leagues could easily come up with over 100 Runes overnight. The harder part is recruiting good players with all the time, effort and money already invested in leagues.
most leagues already are carrying 30-40 dead members anyway. whats the point if increasing the limit?
I agree that leagues should not be expanded further and if it does happen it should be increased by a small number
Also there should not be more leagues being formed there are not enough players to support the leagues that are out there
id like to see Plarium purge all inactives,
If Plarium wants increase the members a league can carry i would suggest the max on 50 members.
It would help beacon holders to get 50 members more to defend them better but dont overpower them that they have to much space to take away the members of smaller leagues in 1 rownoooo....what would we raid for resources? maybe the inactives that are below level 35 but not the higher level onesid like to see Plarium purge all inactives,
id be good with level 45.IronApex Turok said:noooo....what would we raid for resources? maybe the inactives that are below level 35 but not the higher level onesid like to see Plarium purge all inactives,
remove bots, now remove inactives, what next remove non coinersThey would leave by themselves after being pounded into the ground after all the other targets have been removed, Then they would be removed for being inactive. We know whats next after that.
remove bots, now remove inactives, what next remove non coinersim pretty sure plarium did that with the 50% boost
I would hate to be in a 300 person league in a tourby with league bonus
2.2xs point goal....1000000+ but no worries since 250+k will get you 1.2xs .....
But you could use it to stack a league with tons of defense by alts to idle only for thier defense.
Could use it to form a super duper puppy hating league.
You could use to hold the world hostage for 1 million dollars!
