Все Категории

I think there needs to be a timeout limit on matches

I think there needs to be a timeout limit on matches

Поиск
22 янв. 2020, 00:4822.01.20
0

I think there needs to be a timeout limit on matches

I believe that there needs to be a time out on matches as there are times when matches gone for over half an hour going nowhere whatever point you make it which I think 15 minutes is acceptable whoever is in front at that point should be the winner
Просмотры
500
Комментарии
4
Комментарии
22 янв. 2020, 05:3022.01.20
13.02.19
1564

Hi,

Thanks for your suggestion, I'll send it to the devs. 
22 янв. 2020, 08:2622.01.20
12.04.19
210

daergon said:


I believe that there needs to be a time out on matches as there are times when matches gone for over half an hour going nowhere whatever point you make it which I think 15 minutes is acceptable whoever is in front at that point should be the winner

NO to 'whoever is in front'.

Your objective as ATTACKER is to KILL DEFENCE team. If they are still standing at timeout you have failed - defeat screen.

22 янв. 2020, 09:5022.01.20
13.02.19
1564
ksthecr0w said:

daergon said:


I believe that there needs to be a time out on matches as there are times when matches gone for over half an hour going nowhere whatever point you make it which I think 15 minutes is acceptable whoever is in front at that point should be the winner

NO to 'whoever is in front'.

Your objective as ATTACKER is to KILL DEFENCE team. If they are still standing at timeout you have failed - defeat screen.

Agree.
23 янв. 2020, 01:2923.01.20
20.06.19
2181
ksthecr0w said:

daergon said:


I believe that there needs to be a time out on matches as there are times when matches gone for over half an hour going nowhere whatever point you make it which I think 15 minutes is acceptable whoever is in front at that point should be the winner

NO to 'whoever is in front'.

Your objective as ATTACKER is to KILL DEFENCE team. If they are still standing at timeout you have failed - defeat screen.

Agreed!