Все Категории

Skill Upgrade Calculations Question

Skill Upgrade Calculations Question

Поиск
19 июнь 2019, 01:2119.06.19
11.05.19
7

Skill Upgrade Calculations Question

Let's say a skill heals for 15% Max HP without any points into upgrades.  And then you upgrade it and it gets a +10% Heal buff.  I understand that the calculation is 10% of that 15, totaling 16.5% Heal for the skill. 

 

I am wondering if this method of calculation is the same across the board for all types of skill upgrades.  Let's use Warmaiden as a new example.  Crumbling Blast has a 75% of placing a debuff.  After the skill is upgraded and gets a +10% Buff/Debuff Chance, does this mean that the chance of applying the debuff is now 82.5% (as a result of adding 10% of 75), or is it now 85% Chance (as a result of straight addition)?

Просмотры
1k
Комментарии
5
Комментарии
19 июнь 2019, 11:4119.06.19
22.03.19
217

From what I understand it's only healing abilities that are multiplicative instead of additive. So for debuff skills, it's additive. So 75% + 10% = 85%. Whereas damage buffs are applied at the end of the original damage. So 5000 damage + 10% = 5500 damage.


There may be other examples of multiplicative skill increases/masteries, though I don't remember them if there are.
19 июнь 2019, 14:2219.06.19
11.05.19
7
Okay!  Thanks for the fast response.
20 июнь 2019, 09:4020.06.19
13.05.19
2344

The game did a Video on it.

I believe 3 different things were multiplied.

-Heal %

-Damage %

-Shield Buff %


The rest were added onto the score.


ChosenBrad22Moderator
21 июнь 2019, 04:1421.06.19
30.03.19
10
PlayerJ is correct!
2 дек. 2020, 05:3002.12.20
07.12.19
30

I posted an additional question to this topic before finding it via searching for information. https://plarium.com/forum/en/raid-shadow-legends/674_game-discussion/212316_skill-upgrade-question/

This post indicates +chance upgrades are not multiplicative, which adds further mystery to the example in my recent posting.

Please point out and forgive me if I am being a total airhead and missing something obvious.


Thank you,