Suggestion from a Player Leaving the Game

6 Replies
User
24 July, 2019, 3:14 AM UTC

Though I have enjoyed playing the game. The one part I don't enjoy is being farmed by others who are other player who are 15+ levels higher than I. Where they are throwing their trash troops against me and there is nothing I can do to defend against. My suggestion, there is a 5 level buffer. Any one whose base is within 5 levels, higher or lower, than you can be directly targeted. This restriction is only limited to your town/base. It at least means people have a chance at defending themselves and having fun instead of being the obvious target of other much higher towns/bases.

Just a thought. After being repeatedly stripped of resources multiple times by an individual much higher than myself.

Thanks for giving me the time to vent.

Cheers.

UTC +0:00
3
User
24 July, 2019, 3:40 AM UTC

Though your suggestion has merit, you cannot be farmed if you have a shield.

Your problem is one mentioned many times on the forum.

I would imagine you have never played before and are playing in a kingdom with very experienced players who have jumped from another kingdom after laying there doggo, and getting fat,  ready to move and  pounce on people like you,

This is a direct consequence of how the owners like to operate the game.Players leave who might otherwise have stayed.

UTC +0:00
0
User
24 July, 2019, 5:21 AM UTC

I totally agree with HETZER

UTC +0:00
0
User
27 July, 2019, 12:09 PM UTC

They'll just get their lower leveled "farm towns" and reinforce the troops and attack. There are ways around your suggestion. 


UTC +8:00
0
User
28 July, 2019, 12:04 AM UTC

There are always players on the make.

I dont think they will take up the idea about attacking only in your own range, but if they did introduce it, I am sure they could work around any work around, if they were outside the allotted range they wouldnt /shouldnt be allowed to do as you suggested.

UTC +0:00
0
User
2 August, 2019, 8:52 AM UTC

What is mentioned here is a proof of poor and non-user friendly design. The scope of PO is to frustrate the players getting as much cash as possible from special offers. The case described is a product design  flaw that in my opinion is intended to be there.

As about responses defending this obvious flaw, I tend to feel some kind of affiliation towards the producing company/development team/Product Owner.

And that is coming from a person that spend a euro or two on this game and has designed / developed / managed a system or two.
UTC +2:00
0
User
2 August, 2019, 3:07 PM UTC

Asamaras.

Are you reading something here that I am not?

Have you somehow posted in the wrong place?

You seem to be talking about special offers, do you mean bank offers?

It doesnt appear to be about offers , but an often complained area of the game.


Though I would agree that these types of games do have an inherent flaw . which I think is unavoidable.

I dont see anyone defending a design flaw as you suggest, and as you pointed out, if whatever you are talking about is meant to be there  its not a really a flaw.

Though an opposite view point is always a possibility ,like yourself, I tend to be suspicious about the origin and intentions of certain posts that seem to be defending the indifensiveable, but unlike yourself who is something an expert in this area, I am not, and havent worked in such a field,nor advocating in favour of anyone or anything,though course saying so doesnt prove it.


UTC +0:00
0
6991807 users registered; 129370 topics; 484683 posts; our newest member:sydiadredd