Suggestion from a Player Leaving the Game
6
Replies
|
||||
24 July, 2019, 3:14 AM UTC
Though I have enjoyed playing the game. The one part I don't enjoy is being farmed by others who are other player who are 15+ levels higher than I. Where they are throwing their trash troops against me and there is nothing I can do to defend against. My suggestion, there is a 5 level buffer. Any one whose base is within 5 levels, higher or lower, than you can be directly targeted. This restriction is only limited to your town/base. It at least means people have a chance at defending themselves and having fun instead of being the obvious target of other much higher towns/bases. Just a thought. After being repeatedly stripped of resources multiple times by an individual much higher than myself. Thanks for giving me the time to vent. Cheers. UTC +0:00
3
|
||||
24 July, 2019, 3:40 AM UTC
Though your suggestion has merit, you cannot be farmed if you have a shield. Your problem is one mentioned many times on the forum. I would imagine you have never played before and are playing in a kingdom with very experienced players who have jumped from another kingdom after laying there doggo, and getting fat, ready to move and pounce on people like you, This is a direct consequence of how the owners like to operate the game.Players leave who might otherwise have stayed. UTC +0:00
0
|
||||
24 July, 2019, 5:21 AM UTC
I totally agree with HETZER UTC +0:00
0
|
||||
27 July, 2019, 12:09 PM UTC
They'll just get their lower leveled "farm towns" and reinforce the troops and attack. There are ways around your suggestion. UTC +8:00
0
|
||||
28 July, 2019, 12:04 AM UTC
There are always players on the make. I dont think they will take up the idea about attacking only in your own range, but if they did introduce it, I am sure they could work around any work around, if they were outside the allotted range they wouldnt /shouldnt be allowed to do as you suggested. UTC +0:00
0
|
||||
2 August, 2019, 8:52 AM UTC
What is mentioned here is a proof of poor and non-user friendly design. The scope of PO is to frustrate the players getting as much cash as possible from special offers. The case described is a product design flaw that in my opinion is intended to be there. As about responses defending this obvious flaw, I tend to feel some kind of affiliation towards the producing company/development team/Product Owner. And that is coming from a person that spend a euro or two on this game and has designed / developed / managed a system or two.UTC +2:00
0
|
||||
2 August, 2019, 3:07 PM UTC
Asamaras. Are you reading something here that I am not? Have you somehow posted in the wrong place? You seem to be talking about special offers, do you mean bank offers? It doesnt appear to be about offers , but an often complained area of the game. Though I would agree that these types of games do have an inherent flaw . which I think is unavoidable. I dont see anyone defending a design flaw as you suggest, and as you pointed out, if whatever you are talking about is meant to be there its not a really a flaw. Though an opposite view point is always a possibility ,like yourself, I tend to be suspicious about the origin and intentions of certain posts that seem to be defending the indifensiveable, but unlike yourself who is something an expert in this area, I am not, and havent worked in such a field,nor advocating in favour of anyone or anything,though course saying so doesnt prove it. UTC +0:00
0
|
||||
|