brunsonthomas said:

I know we have asked several times to allow the Marshal to force troops out of a Beacon and the Fortress. Since you don't want to let the Marshal do it alone. Then make it so that the Marshal and two designated officers must agree as well. This will allow better control of the members when Fortress downgrades and Beacon exchanges could be accomplished more easily. The other possibility is to allow two co Marshals in a league so that a Marshal and both co Marshals must agree before action can be accomplished.

Edit: Thomas, as far as I understand you still want us to give Marshalls and/or Captains (in this case) to be able to move defensive troops from Beacons and Fortresses. I can see the reason why it might be helpful, but it's still too risky. Maybe we could discuss some details such as possible limitations?

P.S. Sorry for confusion with previous response.

Please can we get an icon added similar to the Wraith icon, that easily shows who's castle we have troop reinforcements at. Also, adding a simple tab/column under the "My League/warriors" section, so it is easier to track to whom we have sent reinforcements too. I know obviously we can go to our Keep, & look there, but when you have 40, 50, 75 pages of names to look through, it can take a LONG time, & be quite buggy on the eyes lol. A simple icon or column added somewhere would make this so much easier.

I know that some leagues cannot fill their ranks but some of the leagues could desparately use more people. Could we get the maximum number of league members raised to 200?

brunsonthomas said:

I know we have asked several times to allow the Marshal to force troops out of a Beacon and the Fortress. Since you don't want to let the Marshal do it alone. Then make it so that the Marshal and two designated officers must agree as well. This will allow better control of the members when Fortress downgrades and Beacon exchanges could be accomplished more easily. The other possibility is to allow two co Marshals in a league so that a Marshal and both co Marshals must agree before action can be accomplished.

Edit: Thomas, as far as I understand you still want us to give Marshalls and/or Captains (in this case) to be able to move defensive troops from Beacons and Fortresses. I can see the reason why it might be helpful, but it's still too risky. Maybe we could discuss some details such as possible limitations?

P.S. Sorry for confusion with previous response.

brunsonthomas said:

Eugenia Misura said:

brunsonthomas said:

I know we have asked several times to allow the Marshal to force troops out of a Beacon and the Fortress. Since you don't want to let the Marshal do it alone. Then make it so that the Marshal and two designated officers must agree as well. This will allow better control of the members when Fortress downgrades and Beacon exchanges could be accomplished more easily. The other possibility is to allow two co Marshals in a league so that a Marshal and both co Marshals must agree before action can be accomplished.

Edit: Thomas, as far as I understand you still want us to give Marshalls and/or Captains (in this case) to be able to move defensive troops from Beacons and Fortresses. I can see the reason why it might be helpful, but it's still too risky. Maybe we could discuss some details such as possible limitations?

P.S. Sorry for confusion with previous response.

How about a limit of say 10 per Beacon or Fortress per week. Limit the number of people that you can kick out of any building would be a reasonable compromise.

I don't like this suggestion, because it takes away the freedom of the players. If a player is inactive... they should get kicked anyway for a beacon transfer.. no need to have dead weight.

also.. it could be used maliciously by the marshal/captain... ie they take a lvl 1 beacon.. move a player they plan on kicking defence to that level 1 and then have another league hit it, wiping our all of the players defence.

brunsonthomas said:

Eugenia Misura said:

brunsonthomas said:

I know we have asked several times to allow the Marshal to force troops out of a Beacon and the Fortress. Since you don't want to let the Marshal do it alone. Then make it so that the Marshal and two designated officers must agree as well. This will allow better control of the members when Fortress downgrades and Beacon exchanges could be accomplished more easily. The other possibility is to allow two co Marshals in a league so that a Marshal and both co Marshals must agree before action can be accomplished.

Edit: Thomas, as far as I understand you still want us to give Marshalls and/or Captains (in this case) to be able to move defensive troops from Beacons and Fortresses. I can see the reason why it might be helpful, but it's still too risky. Maybe we could discuss some details such as possible limitations?

P.S. Sorry for confusion with previous response.

How about a limit of say 10 per Beacon or Fortress per week. Limit the number of people that you can kick out of any building would be a reasonable compromise.

I don't like this suggestion, because it takes away the freedom of the players. If a player is inactive... they should get kicked anyway for a beacon transfer.. no need to have dead weight.

also.. it could be used maliciously by the marshal/captain... ie they take a lvl 1 beacon.. move a player they plan on kicking defence to that level 1 and then have another league hit it, wiping our all of the players defence.

While its annoying at times to have people move D, its their choice to move the defence.

brunsonthomas said:

Eugenia Misura said:

brunsonthomas said:

I know we have asked several times to allow the Marshal to force troops out of a Beacon and the Fortress. Since you don't want to let the Marshal do it alone. Then make it so that the Marshal and two designated officers must agree as well. This will allow better control of the members when Fortress downgrades and Beacon exchanges could be accomplished more easily. The other possibility is to allow two co Marshals in a league so that a Marshal and both co Marshals must agree before action can be accomplished.

Edit: Thomas, as far as I understand you still want us to give Marshalls and/or Captains (in this case) to be able to move defensive troops from Beacons and Fortresses. I can see the reason why it might be helpful, but it's still too risky. Maybe we could discuss some details such as possible limitations?

P.S. Sorry for confusion with previous response.

How about a limit of say 10 per Beacon or Fortress per week. Limit the number of people that you can kick out of any building would be a reasonable compromise.

I don't like this suggestion, because it takes away the freedom of the players. If a player is inactive... they should get kicked anyway for a beacon transfer.. no need to have dead weight.

also.. it could be used maliciously by the marshal/captain... ie they take a lvl 1 beacon.. move a player they plan on kicking defence to that level 1 and then have another league hit it, wiping our all of the players defence.

While its annoying at times to have people move D, its their choice to move the defence.

brunsonthomas said:

I know we have asked several times to allow the Marshal to force troops out of a Beacon and the Fortress. Since you don't want to let the Marshal do it alone. Then make it so that the Marshal and two designated officers must agree as well. This will allow better control of the members when Fortress downgrades and Beacon exchanges could be accomplished more easily. The other possibility is to allow two co Marshals in a league so that a Marshal and both co Marshals must agree before action can be accomplished.

Edit: Thomas, as far as I understand you still want us to give Marshalls and/or Captains (in this case) to be able to move defensive troops from Beacons and Fortresses. I can see the reason why it might be helpful, but it's still too risky. Maybe we could discuss some details such as possible limitations?

P.S. Sorry for confusion with previous response.

GoGo Knightmare said:

Hide the new unit ranks from being able to be seen by all.

Just like that actually stats of a troops power, only the user should be able to see it.

Can you please specify why you want us to do so? 

example

http://prntscr.com/ex73xb

as shown..... I can tell right now with a trigger troop what this person has as far as power and what their main focus is on troops. those ranks I see on the guy on the right should only be able to be seen by the person who owns those troops, which is him. sure I can use this to my advantage, but it is more of a liability than a gain. and if yall are not going to change it....

then I just gave those that follow the forums a advantage :) I will accept small payments of tribute to a follow up email address... lol with unmarked 1 and 5 $ bills. Euros and AUD accepted.

Jezebel said:

once again - please STOP with these pop ups in the middle of our game to make purchases - we all know where to look for offers if we choose to spend money 

these pop ups occur at the most inopportune time and if they cost me troops I will NOT be happy

also eliminating these will reduce lag etc in the game - you keep adding useless features that do not benefit us but instead impede on our game play

I've passed this feedback, Lady Jezebel, there is no need to remind about it in Suggestion thread.

I agree!

This game looks like an ATM ...

There is no Player respect !

If u are loaded VISA...in few weeks u do evrithing . In my opinion it is an abuse of the human greed for money.

The old players should get a bonus...and a heavy coiner should have limits.

Make at Black Market a way to exchange the Hero's Equipment !

Delete this from my screen! I dont play your lottery!

Eugenia Misura said:

Snowgoon said:

Add Curses to the game

Sometimes a revenge raid or fireball just isn't enough, we need something more .....

Add limited duration Curses

10% off everything for 24 hours, or 20% off for 12 hours

This would slow all production, reduce offense/defense and troop production etc for 1 day
Additional Curses would add to the duration but not the effect
Mini curses should be bought using Soulstones etc

Click LIKE if you love this idea

I agree with commens below your idea, I don't think that players will like the idea of decreasing all of the game parameters. 

How typical and hypocritical of the forum moguls to dismiss this idea

yet they are perfectly happy to apply debuffs from flag tournaments

Debuffs affect an entire league for 7 days - Curses would only affect one player for a few hours

Curses and mini curses could be designed to target selected parameters - I only suggested all parameters for the biggest curses, but did not expect those to be approved

There are none so blind as those who will not see

Eugenia Misura said:

Snowgoon said:

Add Curses to the game

Sometimes a revenge raid or fireball just isn't enough, we need something more .....

Add limited duration Curses

10% off everything for 24 hours, or 20% off for 12 hours

This would slow all production, reduce offense/defense and troop production etc for 1 day
Additional Curses would add to the duration but not the effect
Mini curses should be bought using Soulstones etc

Click LIKE if you love this idea

I agree with commens below your idea, I don't think that players will like the idea of decreasing all of the game parameters. 

How typical and hypocritical of the forum moguls to dismiss this idea

yet they are perfectly happy to apply debuffs from flag tournaments

Debuffs affect an entire league for 7 days - Curses would only affect one player for a few hours

Curses and mini curses could be designed to target selected parameters - I only suggested all parameters for the biggest curses, but did not expect those to be approved

There are none so blind as those who will not see

GoGo Knightmare said:

Top leagues can take your flag... but you can not debuff them, only people within your own sub-sub group.

If any league can take another leagues flag, then that league should able to be debuffed by that league. If a top tier team can captures our flag. Then by all means I should be able to debuff them if the opportunity arises...

Lord Mark said:

I agree!

This game looks like an ATM ...

There is no Player respect !

If u are loaded VISA...in few weeks u do evrithing . In my opinion it is an abuse of the human greed for money.

The old players should get a bonus...and a heavy coiner should have limits.

Make at Black Market a way to exchange the Hero's Equipment !

Delete this from my screen! I dont play your lottery!

Can i get a reply from CM ? Dont stand there and watch...u know me !

BTW: Did u see that Ocult and Bestiary can be order now ? :)

Nice job !

Suggestion:  New Castle Skins