This topic is closed

Vote needed for Marshals and Captains.

72 Replies
Looney DaLoon
29 October, 2016, 6:28 PM UTC

I agree:

1) Both fortress' and beacons need to have "The Button."

2) "The Button" should be all inclusive for the fortress/beacon  *AND*  one for selecting all of an individual member's troops.

3) Only the Marshall and those Captains that the Marshall designates should have rights to the buttons.

4) All returned troops should go directly to the catacombs.


   The reasons behind these buttons makes perfect sense.  This game is a world-wide game and several leagues have members scattered across different time-zones.  Not all member's speak the same language and online translators are imperfect when it comes to translating important league affecting messages.  On top of that, each league has members with varying levels of activity; we all have real lives that effect our ability to play consistently.  The Marshall *NEEDS* to have the ability to make league wide changes in a timely manner, regardless of player circumstances I've listed above.  And the Marshall can't be expected to do everything for their league by themselves, so allowing *TRUSTED* Captains rights to help the Marshall only makes sense.  However Plarium envisioned the beacons to function (transferable or not) doesn't matter when in practice they are used in a diplomatic fashion (as well as the fortresses when it comes to upgrades/downgrades), so to keep the enjoyment of the game for new and old players, "The Buttons" need to happen.


-Looney DaLoon

Captain of Dark Solace

Untamed Lands Server
UTC +7:00
KING
30 October, 2016, 1:18 AM UTC

oracle said:


NO I don't agree

giving one player a control of someone else troops, that is blatant dictatorship. Only leagues that function on the principles of dictatorship will agree for these


NO NO NO 

Not that my vote matters, in three weeks the post will be locked( I hope in less days) 

if you cant trust your marshal and captains then you in the wrong league .... this is just my opinion


with that being said i agree there should be a button to send back troops .... it will avoid players losing troops for no reason


either way if a marshal or captain wanted to get rid of people of beacons there is a button to boot players which would basically remove there troops from beacons ....... so all the button will do is keep them in the league and protect them from others


ALSO i would like to add ..... im glad you guys are asking for feed back before applying something its much appreciated and you will build a good relationship with the players if this continues :)
UTC +0:00
Sculptor
30 October, 2016, 4:44 PM UTC

I would vote YES,


Not because it is easier, if you are a marshall/captain these things just need te be done. We shouldn't be lazy.


But the problem in my opinion is that if you want to plan this you'll need to sent out a league letter a (couple) day in advance. And being that there are enough spies out there that doesn't work.

Member of Blue Magic
UTC +0:00
KING
30 October, 2016, 4:49 PM UTC
Sculptor said:

I would vote YES,


Not because it is easier, if you are a marshall/captain these things just need te be done. We shouldn't be lazy.


But the problem in my opinion is that if you want to plan this you'll need to sent out a league letter a (couple) day in advance. And being that there are enough spies out there that doesn't work.

if you had a button like that spies lose there purpose ..... you send a mail simply saying ... in 2 days we will be trading a beacon away i will be sending all defense back to your catacombs ....... so spies would need there league to hit a full beacon no matter what LOL cause it will remain stacked till the hour of the trade :D
UTC +0:00
Oracle
31 October, 2016, 8:46 AM UTC
So I guise every marshal vote that say NO is deleted, especially mine. then what is the use of voting if you delete evry vote that say NO. these is not voting, these is dictatorship. Why delete arguments that are agaist these idea, evry marshal vote deserved top be heard, why delete my vote as a Marshal, Am i not allowed to lay down my thesis. 
Gedleyihlekisa: Oracle the postremogeniture
UTC +2:00
Reaper
31 October, 2016, 10:34 AM UTC
but you could make your vote i read this before and where should the others make the quote on your terms if its deleted ?
UTC +1:00
brunsonthomas
Moderator
1 November, 2016, 1:59 PM UTC

http://plarium.com/forum/en/stormfall-age-of-war/suggestions/23432_your-suggestions/?post=201364


I appreciate the time all the Marshals and Captains took to send replies.

UTC +5:00
Aaron KT3
4 November, 2016, 3:05 AM UTC
Agree but for individual sends only.
Aaron
UTC +0:00
Lady Nerium KT-S2
4 November, 2016, 4:19 AM UTC

brunsonthomas said:


http://plarium.com/forum/en/stormfall-age-of-war/suggestions/23432_your-suggestions/?post=201364


I appreciate the time all the Marshals and Captains took to send replies.

So it looks like we're stuck kicking players just to get their troops out of Beacons.  Plarium said: "We don't want to give players such power over someone's Units",  but that's kind of hypocritical isn't it? Only difference is this would be the Marshall making the decision, and any Captain can kick someone. Oops, shouldn't have mentioned that, because next we'll not be able to kick someone, in case it gives us power over another player.

I think, therefore I game.
UTC +5:00
Sarah Walker
4 November, 2016, 5:54 AM UTC
This is ok to transfer a beacon but is does not sit well in a war game , What about when the beacons are under attack it would be so easy to remove the def and duck 
UTC +0:00
Alyona Kolomiitseva
Community Manager
4 November, 2016, 11:16 AM UTC
We've heard your feedback, guys. And I will raise this topic once again on the next suggestions meeting.
Plarium Community Manager. Please note that I will be unable to respond to your private messages, review your tickets, or check your account information. All technical issues should be directed to our Support Team at plrm.me/Support_Plarium
UTC +2:00
Tastiger
5 November, 2016, 12:09 PM UTC

there is a very large down side to having  Marshall return your troops..the members in 99% of leagues are global and there for time zones are different .

Have u ever defended a member ? who may have returned your defence to your castle due to fb,s or the fact the raid passed .?

only to find when u come back online your def you sent is now gone..? all that is left is what u are able to resurrect .?

Great if it is  pvp ..but what if its not .?

i have been with leagues changing beacons and u have long ago,status members  that dont remove it .? i can see the why a  Marshall would like being able to remove it as well ..what if that member was u and u are on holidays for 1 week .? only to come back

your defence returned is now all dead as a larger player was looking for pvp .? ..just a thought .

UTC +0:00
Reaper
5 November, 2016, 12:15 PM UTC
Thats why Looney said the troops should send to cats directly (same system if you attack an empty hamlet). If they are in cats they are safe even with long ago or not
UTC +1:00
1664315 users registered; 33908 topics; 252912 posts; our newest member:mausersolomon