Rotos is the new Tormin, just because is the last (good) fusion.

There will be other more op champions, for sure and Rotos will lose his podium, but you'll always see those 10 heroes repeated multiple times.

Hi Valdys,

I totally appreciate that 10-12 heroes will always dominate, I certainly don't want equality between 350+ heroes (that would devalue the system and be impossible). But if we look at WoW, the arena at top and bottom have very similar and diverse combos. It is about skill (and a little about gear). 

If Raid can slowly shift towards choice of abilities, novel combos, and maintain equality between 10-15 heroes --- that would be amazing. 

How about an arena division with no legendary heroes? I ask because I have none (don't count Wurlim, though I guess this is the only place he would be useful. But in all seriousness, would the same thing occur. Would all teams have the same 6-10, or would you see much more diversity?  This would make for a cool 2-week tournament with everyone starting at the bottom. It would be interesting if they could do divisions based on great hall progress. The assumption being that gear/GH progress are highly correlated, this would lead to a true test of strategy.  

I'm interested in opinions of what would be your best non-legendary arena team. I'm asking you experts (Ethan, J, Valdys, Daering), apologies if I omitted anyone. All opinions welcome.

How about an arena division with no legendary heroes? I ask because I have none (don't count Wurlim, though I guess this is the only place he would be useful. But in all seriousness, would the same thing occur. Would all teams have the same 6-10, or would you see much more diversity?  This would make for a cool 2-week tournament with everyone starting at the bottom. It would be interesting if they could do divisions based on great hall progress. The assumption being that gear/GH progress are highly correlated, this would lead to a true test of strategy.  

I'm interested in opinions of what would be your best non-legendary arena team. I'm asking you experts (Ethan, J, Valdys, Daering), apologies if I omitted anyone. All opinions welcome.

Thoughts on my non legendary arena idea tournament are welcome. Yes, I know it will never happen for a few obvious reasons.

Trips said:

How about an arena division with no legendary heroes? I ask because I have none (don't count Wurlim, though I guess this is the only place he would be useful. But in all seriousness, would the same thing occur. Would all teams have the same 6-10, or would you see much more diversity?  This would make for a cool 2-week tournament with everyone starting at the bottom. It would be interesting if they could do divisions based on great hall progress. The assumption being that gear/GH progress are highly correlated, this would lead to a true test of strategy.  

I'm interested in opinions of what would be your best non-legendary arena team. I'm asking you experts (Ethan, J, Valdys, Daering), apologies if I omitted anyone. All opinions welcome.

Thoughts on my non legendary arena idea tournament are welcome. Yes, I know it will never happen for a few obvious reasons.

For top 50 arena players

100% whale players (lol)

98% have Rotos 

67% have Arbiter [Void] (speed lead)

58% have Siphi [Void] (should be higher, just hard to get)

For top 50 arena players

100% whale players (lol)

98% have Rotos 

67% have Arbiter [Void] (speed lead)

58% have Siphi [Void] (should be higher, just hard to get)

....