If there is a coalition with 5 people in it, that is a waste, there is no need.
My coalition is a waste?
Each hegemon manages his coalition as he sees fit.
I create my coalition to be able to make tutorials and help people, I do not care what they connect and whether or not they help me whenever I can I will help them.
And now it turns out that that is not profitable and they throw away our work for years, in my case more than 3, to the rubbish bin? not counting the drachmas spent (in my case only drachmas but in other real money).
if only active players remain who will make sieges for the weekly top?
If your coalition comprises of 5 people and you fear that less than 60% of your coalition is active......then you answered your own question my friend.
and to your last comment on this quote, that was the question I am trying to get answered. I believe any coalition with low participation should be disbanded BUT I do not believe that they should delete the accounts and create more pools. DID YOU NOT READ MY RESPONSE?
And of course we appreciate all of your contributions to the game forum.
do you understand the problem? imagine you pay for somethng in game, you go on holidays 15 days and when youare back, palrium decided you are not owrth that units, or bonus or etc that you bought, this is the same,,,,
Again, this rule seems to apply to coalitions that have less than 60% participation, in order to remain active, simply remove a player. If a coalition has 57% active players and face elimination and you have 1 member on vacation for 30 days, why do you have to remove player on vacation? You just have to remove one inactive player that's been gone for a long time and has never communicated with you
Obviously you keep the member that is on holiday because they told you they were and you make a note.
So if I have 50 members inactive, 1 is on holiday and 49 of them have been missing for hundreds of days, why would i remove the guy on holiday????
rix, i understand what you say, but wahts the diference of being in a coa or not? f there are coas is because palrium let them created & paid them but now they ahve ddecided that 15 days is enough time to take from them what they paid...
That is incorrect. If the coalition has less than 60% participation for 14 days the "coalition is removed and inactives turned into pools. We all know that almost every coalition has players inactive for 100,200,300+ days. It is very easy for a coalition to remain alive by removing those inactive players if there is danger of being eliminated. The hegemon and an polemarch can handle this simple task.
I hope you understand what I mean