Rubber Room

50 Replies
NUT Shot
18 March, 2015, 1:51 AM UTC

fakeasnever said:

@NUT Shot (4 March, 2015, 2:12 PM UTC):
Make sure to pile defence onto your current, in case they hit yours   lol

If you want to hit emitters with 100k troops go for it. No need to pile on more. 0 infantry, 0 armored. You do the math. 

UTC +0:00
0
fakeasnever
Moderator
18 March, 2015, 2:54 AM UTC

@NUT Shot (18 March, 2015, 1:51 AM UTC):
Hmm... No thanks, I'll pass...

Minimum 40M, maximum 129,543,750...

Maybe next time, though   ;)

If Internet Explorer still asks to be your default browser, then you can do anything :D
UTC +0:00
0
Sir Kenneth
26 April, 2015, 6:23 AM UTC

NUT Shot said:

Plus,  I am engaged now and part of that means paying attention to her. lol. She is way hotter than any of you .......!!! :D

 

 

Congrats on being engaged. Once you have been married a while, you will be back ;-)  rofl

UTC +12:00
0
fakeasnever
Moderator
2 May, 2015, 4:39 PM UTC

@Sir Kenneth (26 April, 2015, 6:23 AM UTC):
Hah, or if they break up   lol

If Internet Explorer still asks to be your default browser, then you can do anything :D
UTC +0:00
0
Kylo Ren
3 May, 2015, 10:06 AM UTC

If the emitter only has 100k worth of Armor and Air

That means a couple of joint attacks of 30k of troopers and a coupe of thousand light tanks could really damage it

UTC +0:00
0
BiohazarD
Moderator
3 May, 2015, 6:40 PM UTC

CK Black Mask said:

If the emitter only has 100k worth of Armor and Air

That means a couple of joint attacks of 30k of troopers and a coupe of thousand light tanks could really damage it

Assuming an even split between gauss and interceptors (this would be the weakest possible against troopers), the emitter would have 65 mil defense power vs infantry.  30k troopers is 1.7 mil offense power, so you'd only end up killing like 1% with each wave (because you're outnumbered by about 40 to 1 you kill a lot less than you lose).  

Any opinions expressed by me are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of or constitute official statements by Plarium.
UTC +0:00
0
fakeasnever
Moderator
3 May, 2015, 9:34 PM UTC

@BiohazarD (3 May, 2015, 6:40 PM UTC):
He did include Light Tanks.

I'm sure it makes some difference in the calculation.

What's the calculation like, anyway? Something like side A provides 1/3 total battle power, side B provides 2/3 total battle power, side A loses 2/3 troops, side B loses 1/3 troops?

If Internet Explorer still asks to be your default browser, then you can do anything :D
UTC +0:00
0
BiohazarD
Moderator
4 May, 2015, 12:39 AM UTC

fakeasnever said:

@BiohazarD (3 May, 2015, 6:40 PM UTC):
He did include Light Tanks.

I'm sure it makes some difference in the calculation.

What's the calculation like, anyway? Something like side A provides 1/3 total battle power, side B provides 2/3 total battle power, side A loses 2/3 troops, side B loses 1/3 troops?

Something like that, but it's shifted if one side has more than a few times the power of the other side.  So if the defender has 100k and the attacker sends 10 mil, the defender would lose everything and the attacker would only lose 10-15k. 

Any opinions expressed by me are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of or constitute official statements by Plarium.
UTC +0:00
0
STRM Gladiator
6 May, 2015, 3:04 PM UTC

fakeasnever said:

@BiohazarD (27 February, 2015, 5:51 AM UTC):
Wrecked   lol

If it does, I'll take 2... One for me, the other one for... Me.

My counting may seem a bit off, but I'm officially a plural!   lol

 

Now we know you for who you really are. Gollum.

- Gladiator
UTC +0:00
0
fakeasnever
Moderator
6 May, 2015, 9:25 PM UTC

@STRM Gladiator (6 May, 2015, 3:04 PM UTC):
What?

I can't be important enough to be a plural?   :(   lol

If Internet Explorer still asks to be your default browser, then you can do anything :D
UTC +0:00
0
STRM Gladiator
7 May, 2015, 2:24 PM UTC

Didn't you see my lotr reference? Gollum is a plural, as he has 2 selves :P

"We wants it, we needs it."

- Gladiator
UTC +0:00
0
fakeasnever
Moderator
7 May, 2015, 9:39 PM UTC

@STRM Gladiator (7 May, 2015, 2:24 PM UTC):
I see it now

In what ways do I resemble Gollum, however, our elevated self worth aside?

If Internet Explorer still asks to be your default browser, then you can do anything :D
UTC +0:00
0
STRM Gladiator
8 May, 2015, 2:50 PM UTC

@fakeasnever

 

Well, it's my perception of you. I see you as a 14 year old grandmother, on the verge of exploring the art of necrophilia.

You'd probably be a little scrawny and feeble as well, which means I could probably invade your sector and make it a 6th Uranium Mine.

 

:P

- Gladiator
UTC +0:00
0
fakeasnever
Moderator
8 May, 2015, 7:54 PM UTC

@STRM Gladiator (8 May, 2015, 2:50 PM UTC):
First, a 14 year old grandmother would be biologically impossible (under natural human cycles) for reasons I will not explain.

How does my physical state affect my sector's state?

I have 5 Uranium mines as well... So if you invaded me, you'd get 6.25 Uranium mines total...

Assuming you don't already have other colonies.

If Internet Explorer still asks to be your default browser, then you can do anything :D
UTC +0:00
0
NUT Shot
9 May, 2015, 4:18 PM UTC

Who puts armored and infantry in emitters? lmao. Put it this way mask... the only artillery I own are dizzys. Defense is 100% air and mostly excals.. We dont play this game to collect troops like some others. 

UTC +0:00
0
BiohazarD
Moderator
10 May, 2015, 9:08 AM UTC

NUT Shot said:

Who puts armored and infantry in emitters? lmao. Put it this way mask... the only artillery I own are dizzys. Defense is 100% air and mostly excals.. We dont play this game to collect troops like some others. 

I love killing excals, it makes noobs cry :P

Ints are where it's at. 

And there's nothing wrong with collecting troops, it's how non-coiners build large armies, that doesn't just happen overnight. 

Any opinions expressed by me are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of or constitute official statements by Plarium.
UTC +0:00
0
Goon NoodLes
10 May, 2015, 5:01 PM UTC

BiohazarD said:

NUT Shot said:

Who puts armored and infantry in emitters? lmao. Put it this way mask... the only artillery I own are dizzys. Defense is 100% air and mostly excals.. We dont play this game to collect troops like some others. 

I love killing excals, it makes noobs cry :P

Ints are where it's at. 

And there's nothing wrong with collecting troops, it's how non-coiners build large armies, that doesn't just happen overnight. 

it can happen overnight. if you don't believe it, then your lying to yourself and that is rather foolish to someone who has been in this game

for so long. you know as well as anyone else that interceptors are easier to build than Excalibur platforms. but interceptors back-up excals.

YOUR RIGHT ABOUT MAKING NOOBS CRY BUT IM NOT A NOOB.  I know that I can make a lot more of either. so...... who the hell knows

 

John Cartwright
UTC +0:00
0
NUT Shot
11 May, 2015, 3:46 AM UTC

BiohazarD said:

NUT Shot said:

Who puts armored and infantry in emitters? lmao. Put it this way mask... the only artillery I own are dizzys. Defense is 100% air and mostly excals.. We dont play this game to collect troops like some others. 

I love killing excals, it makes noobs cry :P

Ints are where it's at. 

And there's nothing wrong with collecting troops, it's how non-coiners build large armies, that doesn't just happen overnight. 

You can have your ceppies. I will take my level 20 excals with 2 artis over your weak ceppies anyday. You might want to tighten up on your math skills. Ceppies with 2 artis still arent as good as excals with artis. 

UTC +0:00
0
BiohazarD
Moderator
11 May, 2015, 4:27 AM UTC

NUT Shot said:

BiohazarD said:

NUT Shot said:

Who puts armored and infantry in emitters? lmao. Put it this way mask... the only artillery I own are dizzys. Defense is 100% air and mostly excals.. We dont play this game to collect troops like some others. 

I love killing excals, it makes noobs cry :P

Ints are where it's at. 

And there's nothing wrong with collecting troops, it's how non-coiners build large armies, that doesn't just happen overnight. 

You can have your ceppies. I will take my level 20 excals with 2 artis over your weak ceppies anyday. You might want to tighten up on your math skills. Ceppies with 2 artis still arent as good as excals with artis. 

Nope, but they are cheaper.  So you can get defense power a lot faster by playing infests and winning ints than you can with just building up excals.  If you trade excals for ints in infests, you increase your defense power by 60%. 

So yeah, each of your excals might be stronger, but when my ints outnumber them 2.5 to 1 I still win :)

Any opinions expressed by me are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of or constitute official statements by Plarium.
UTC +0:00
0
NUT Shot
11 May, 2015, 2:17 PM UTC

BiohazarD said:

NUT Shot said:

BiohazarD said:

NUT Shot said:

Who puts armored and infantry in emitters? lmao. Put it this way mask... the only artillery I own are dizzys. Defense is 100% air and mostly excals.. We dont play this game to collect troops like some others. 

I love killing excals, it makes noobs cry :P

Ints are where it's at. 

And there's nothing wrong with collecting troops, it's how non-coiners build large armies, that doesn't just happen overnight. 

You can have your ceppies. I will take my level 20 excals with 2 artis over your weak ceppies anyday. You might want to tighten up on your math skills. Ceppies with 2 artis still arent as good as excals with artis. 

Nope, but they are cheaper.  So you can get defense power a lot faster by playing infests and winning ints than you can with just building up excals.  If you trade excals for ints in infests, you increase your defense power by 60%. 

So yeah, each of your excals might be stronger, but when my ints outnumber them 2.5 to 1 I still win :)

what happens when you cant sustain them cause of credit issues? So, again, excals are 2x better than ceppies. Its mathematically insane to think producing ceppies are beneficial at my point in game. Imperial ceppies get tossed away cause they are 3rd weakest troop I own defensively. Won a bunch of ceppies with my bcs on a level 100 and tossed them in trash. Have to think long term and ceppies are a waste

UTC +0:00
0
1776196 users registered; 47859 topics; 285750 posts; our newest member:bokhars