This topic is closed

Your Suggestions

800 Replies
dworka777
20 August, 2016, 11:28 PM UTC

djmoody said:


dworka777 said:



My point is in having a fun ...

You know if you are playing a game you should have some fun of it, and it should not be boring. If I would loose my army I could go away for 3 months and still my units would be in production rows. I don't want to unbalance the game I want to have fun. But current state of the game is not allowing you to have fun. Plarium stated that they want to see large battles etc. But again they are just heading for money of elite, who is spending 1 000 dollars per month and more. But if you have to stand against something like this http://prnt.sc/c7do1a then it is clear that Plarium is only mocking us.

So my point is that if you would allow us to rebuild then you would definitely see more battles.

Well if the point is the game should be rebalanced between active players and coiners then I am in 100% agreement. That went wrong in this game over 1 year ago.

I can't see Plarium changing this but I would love the playing field to be evened out.

We have F2P, modest P2P and uber P2P. Even the modest P2P are lost in the game against the idiots who are happy to spend tens of thousands of dollars and Plarium lets those uber coiners buy infinite troops instantly. Balance is broken.

Thank you for understanding. I thought that this game should had been fueled by microtransactions that happen time to time. And not that few individuals just break the game with money.

But that is just the peek of an iceberg. There can be written many more things like this, but Plarium does not listen because they have money in their pocket and that is all they want. I already written a post about how game was before and how it is now.

Yes you can argue that they are implementing new features, and there are more events etc. But if the system does not work properly then the new features benefit just a certain group of players. Again I had written a post about this, but no one cares.

So to summ this I just feel that my enemy is Plarium and time. I can't reason with time so I am trying it here with Plarium. But now it only seems that it would be more productive if I would be talking to a wall.
UTC -10:00
Shanarra
21 August, 2016, 5:38 AM UTC

Queue for building upgrades


We can use resources to queue troops to be built.  How about being able to queue building upgrades so once an upgrade completes the next one automatically begins?


That's interesting. I will ask if we can do that.
UTC +0:00
Lady Nerium KT-S2
22 August, 2016, 12:36 AM UTC

Daisygirl said:


Could you add the league icon to the players picture when you view the Garrisons in the keep?



Passed to devs.

Can you add it to the market as well? This would be of great help.


I've passed it as "Add everywhere". 
I think, therefore I game.
UTC +5:00
zach-rose11
22 August, 2016, 1:12 AM UTC
AS I posted earlier, please allow players on server 2, to either relocate on the server through gateways and/or allow the trasnfer of castles from 1 server to the other, please - please - please!! 
UTC +5:00
Ichezis
22 August, 2016, 9:20 AM UTC

Configuring your own Daily Rewards.


This idea just popped into my mind and this is how it works!

1 - Values of Rewards
So first of all, there should be a kind of point system. Each day you'll receive a specific amount of points. This can be random or increasing each day in the Daily Loyalty Roll. These points, which you could call 'Points of Vigor' or 'Loyalty Points', can be spent on purchasing specific daily rewards. The higher the price of such a reward, the better the reward is.

We'll use Loyalty Points as name in this example.

2 - The Process
A player starts at the very first day with 0 points. The player cannot configure his rewards (yet), so the default daily rewards will apply instead.

Until he or she gains the amount of points for replacing the first reward of any day, this means the player can choose out of the rewards that are equal- or lower than his or her budget. The player can assign any day for replacement, however if the player chooses a day that's older than the current date, this means the player has to wait until the day comes again or the player can choose another day for this reward.

Note that the daily reward system provides us with a special reward each 30 days. This spot is also replaceable with those points, though they're a little more expensive in Loyalty Points and give better rewards than other days.

A purchased reward with Loyalty Points is unlocked. This means, that he/she can use it anytime, though the player can only choose the amount of days the reward can be used on out of the 30 for this reward to apply. (e.g If one purchased reward can be used on 3 days, this means that the player can assign three days with the same reward)

3 - The Layout
So, now we kinda have an idea how it works. Let's go to how it looks.

Basically, at the Daily Loyalty Roll tab, there should be a button that says 'Purchase Daily Rewards' or something. A new shop UI opens, showing your balance and the rewards you can purchase.

At the Daily Loyalty tab, outside the shop UI, you should be able to press on a day. This opens either a new UI or a scrolling list above the day, where you can choose your purchased & available rewards.

On each daily reward, a small number should display on how many days this can be applied to, and in the shop it should show it's expense somewhere as well.

4 - No need to expand the daily reward day-count
This basically means that the player can configure their own rewards and with those points you can get higher/better rewards.

Thanks for reading, and I hope that you consider this idea as well. 




I love your idea. But a few questions first:

Would the amount of days you can replace your daily reward be limited? Let's say like 5 per 1st 30 days, 3 per 2nd 30 days, 2 per last 30 days, or so.

A long-time player could, if he/she has all the items purchased, be able to put all the items in any day-slot that's available. This means, that it doesn't matter which day it is, they all are replaceable.

What Items would you be able to buy with those Points? There's no need to create one more Black Market...

Not too much of an expense. For example:


Default:

Day 1: 500 Food, 500 Iron, 500 Gold

Purchasable:

Lowest Price: 5 Paladins, 5 Archers, 500 Food (10 slots)

or

Highest Price: 2500 Maranian Amulets, 5 Dragons (3 slots)


Each slot = 1 day slot.

This means, that the lowest price you see above, can be applied to 10 days in the 90 days of Daily Loyalty Roll. 
The most expensive one, however, can only be applied to 3 days in these 90 days.


Each 30 day slot, should be separate as they give bigger rewards!
Only each 30 days slot can give Sapphires. For example:

Default:

Day 30: 5 Wyvern, 150 Sapphires, 1 Crystal Coffer, 1 +25% Food Production Boost (1 day), 1 Rune Scale.

Purchasable:

Lowest price: 300 Sapphires, 10 Dragons, 1 +50 Experience Booster (4 hours). (2 Slots)

or

Highest price: 50 Dragons, 600 Sapphires, 1 Weor's Protection (1 Slot)

Note that these slots only count for each 30 day slots. (Basically the golden ones)

Apologies for the confusion of the other Black Market. With shop GUI I didn't mean exactly such a thing, it's rather a new UI that shows the purchasable daily slots and your balance that way.

Though, another tab in the Black Market's a better idea perhaps? Then a reference button in the Daily Loyalty Roll menu to the Black Market saying 'Configure your Rewards!' would be convenient too. 

Hope that cleared some stuff up! 







So you mean, it's more for getting a higher reward in exchange for several lower rewards which have the equal price (let's say 10 days 1 are equal 600 Diamonds, and some other Items are also equal 600 Sapphires, but they give you an opportunity to get more Bestiaries/Boosts rather than Resources/Infantry. Right? 

I'll make it visually a bit more clear:








Maybe just removing something inessential and adding something really useful, but equal in Sapphires would have the same effect.

I didn't really understand this one. Could you explain that to me, please?


Let's say if your daily reward for today costs 500 Sapphires, but it's Resources and Boosts, you could choose some Units and boosts instead, but also for the cost of 500 Sapphires.

Ohhh! I see, I'm sorry for the confusion. Let me re-state what I meant:

Default:


Day 1: 500 Food, 500 Iron, 500 Gold

This is the default package you get for day 1. Just like as it is now, every day has a default package.



Purchasable:


Lowest Price: 

Daily reward: 5 Paladins, 5 Archers, 500 Food (10 slots)
Cost: 10 LP's.


The above-standing is the cheapest reward available. The cost of it could be 10 LP's (Loyalty Points) as stated above which is, depending on the idea, equal to 10 days of gameplay. Each day gives you 1 LP. The other idea could be an increasing effect.

(e.g The first 30 days = 1 LP a day, the second 30 days 2 LP's a day, and the third 30 days 3 LP's a day) 


Highest Price:

Daily Reward: 2500 Maranian Amulets, 5 Dragons (3 slots)
Cost: 50 LP's.


The above-standing is the most expensive reward available. The cost of it could be 50 LP's (Loyalty Points) as stated above which is, depending on the idea, equal to 50 days of gameplay. Each day gives you 1 LP. The other idea could be an increasing effect.

(e.g The first 30 days = 1 LP a day, the second 30 days 2 LP's a day, and the third 30 days 3 LP's a day)




Each slot = 1 day slot you can apply this reward to.

This means, that the lowest price you see above, can be applied to 10 days in the 90 days of Daily Loyalty Roll.
The most expensive one, however, can only be applied to 3 days in these 90 days.


Got it now. thanks for the screenshots and details. Passed to devs.
Plarium Global Moderator; "We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone."
UTC +2:00
Gadheras
22 August, 2016, 9:30 AM UTC

How about allow one "unit building queue" per unit type? It would help build units as whole faster, but not ability to build a particular unit much faster. 


With unit type I don't mean a infantry unit type, but like we could keep trinkle out archers, pikes, paladins etc at the same time. Rather than queue up 1000 paladins that take forever to complete, I could now as well make archers and some pikes to feed into bg's at same time.


I doubt it will happen. It has been declined many times. But I will try once again.
UTC +2:00
Gadheras
22 August, 2016, 12:45 PM UTC

Gadheras said:


How about allow one "unit building queue" per unit type? It would help build units as whole faster, but not ability to build a particular unit much faster. 


With unit type I don't mean a infantry unit type, but like we could keep trinkle out archers, pikes, paladins etc at the same time. Rather than queue up 1000 paladins that take forever to complete, I could now as well make archers and some pikes to feed into bg's at same time.


I doubt it will happen. It has been declined many times. But I will try once again.

well something got to give, to bring some sort of ballance back between the heavy coiners and the more modest coiners and f2p players. Like the sum of all posts on the forums here, it can't just be ingored and just close the eyes for can it? 


I can only pass the information, I can't decide how to develop the game :)
UTC +2:00
Rodeo
22 August, 2016, 5:59 PM UTC

Gadheras said:


Gadheras said:


How about allow one "unit building queue" per unit type? It would help build units as whole faster, but not ability to build a particular unit much faster. 


With unit type I don't mean a infantry unit type, but like we could keep trinkle out archers, pikes, paladins etc at the same time. Rather than queue up 1000 paladins that take forever to complete, I could now as well make archers and some pikes to feed into bg's at same time.


I doubt it will happen. It has been declined many times. But I will try once again.
well something got to give, to bring some sort of ballance back between the heavy coiners and the more modest coiners and f2p players. Like the sum of all posts on the forums here, it can't just be ingored and just close the eyes for can it? 

Also consider my suggestion:



Give option to cancel some queue which has not started....

Passed it already.

UTC +5:00
db dbomb
23 August, 2016, 12:55 AM UTC

db dbomb said:


Scroll market trades.

Would like to see more option available to players under these trades (i have included two that i would like to see). Options that can allow more advanced trading.

1. Being able to trade on more than a one on one basis, offering two scrolls for one and vise versa (i vision a 3 on each side of trade option...3 for 2 etc)


It's a good idea, but...Wouldn't it be hard to find a 3x3 match?

2. Adding a small text box for trades. More advanced trades would benefit from being able to include some verbage regarding said offers.


For example, what would it be? 

It may be hard to match a several scroll trade but thats were the comments would come in (just put 3 being max....2 for one is really what id like to be able to do.) You can request interested party to contact you and that this trade may be nego. and could be modified...

It seems that matching 1x1 is much more simple and efficient. I'd like to know what do other players think of your idea.
UTC +5:00
Gadheras
23 August, 2016, 8:22 AM UTC
db dbomb said:

db dbomb said:


Scroll market trades.

Would like to see more option available to players under these trades (i have included two that i would like to see). Options that can allow more advanced trading.

1. Being able to trade on more than a one on one basis, offering two scrolls for one and vise versa (i vision a 3 on each side of trade option...3 for 2 etc)


It's a good idea, but...Wouldn't it be hard to find a 3x3 match?

2. Adding a small text box for trades. More advanced trades would benefit from being able to include some verbage regarding said offers.


For example, what would it be? 

It may be hard to match a several scroll trade but thats were the comments would come in (just put 3 being max....2 for one is really what id like to be able to do.) You can request interested party to contact you and that this trade may be nego. and could be modified...

It seems that matching 1x1 is much more simple and efficient. I'd like to know what do other players think of your idea.
Being able to trade more scrolls at same time would be awsome. Particular for like league scroll masters, that can work towards more stream line the library they sitting on.
UTC +2:00
Rodeo
23 August, 2016, 8:51 AM UTC

Rodeo: (20 August, 2016, 3:47 AM UTC)

Hello,

I could see various shades of colors are maintained for every league to show their influence over the Map.

Actually you need only 5 colors and you already have such color demarcation for league status like

At War - Red

At Peace - Green

At Ally - Blue

No Status - Grey

Home League influence - (Choose one)

Same colors can be used to show the league influence on the global Map.

 

Territories with same colors may look a bit confusing.

Rodeo: (23 August, 2016, 10:00 AM UTC)


Well there are boundaries clearly de-marked in black.

As a player, i need to understand which ones are my allies influential area and which ones are under my enemies influential. Currently too many colors are not helping in any way.

For all my league members there will be only one view of the Map. well for a different league depending on their allies and enemies they will have their own one view among their league players.

Maybe not color, but some marks showing they are allies/enemies, etc?

UTC +5:00
Rodeo
23 August, 2016, 9:53 AM UTC

Capture Hamlet - Drop down option - for Differently-abled community:


It will be good to have a drop down button option...than having a scroll.





With checkboxes? But you still won't be able to choose some Units, not all of the kind (for instance, if you want to exclude strategic Units.) So you will still need to scroll to see them all.
UTC +5:00
Rodeo
23 August, 2016, 10:00 AM UTC

Keep - Drop down Option - for Differently-abled community:


It will be good to have a drop down button than having a scroll. Also need to know our total offense and total defense in the keep. This should be displayed irrespective of my units in castle or in catacomb.(if possible units sent for raids,in my sieged castle,in reinforcement castle).




To see your total strength, you need to choose Units. It doesn't work any other way, as all the bonuses are dynamic.
UTC +5:00
Rodeo
23 August, 2016, 10:07 AM UTC

Another Suggestion:


It will be good to have an option to send units from Catacomb to my own castle.


But you already have this option.
UTC +5:00
Rodeo
23 August, 2016, 12:30 PM UTC

Unable to upload my own Avatar:


It will be nice if you allow us to upload our very own Avatar







Declined. We are not planning to allow players to upload their avatars. Only if you connect via Facebook your avatar will automatically upload.
UTC +5:00
djmoody
23 August, 2016, 2:25 PM UTC

Taken from another post but I guess it really belongs in suggestions

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:


If you mean Heats here, they will disappear soon. They are a part of August Event.

If you mean some other Tournaments, you can always suggest something to improve them. We are making many changes to the existing Tournaments, and we want your opinion.

I always thought a raiding tournament would be good. 

All other aspect of gameplay have tournaments except that (other than weekly tourni - but BG, PvP have weekly tourno and special events also). And raiding is pretty much the only gameplay that requires true activity - so a tournament like that would reward real players as opposed to coiners. 

It would be nice to give at least one thing back to them.


I will suggest that to our devs.

Everyone has a right to an opinion. No one has a right to their opinion being respected by other if it can't be backed up with rational and logic explanation
UTC +0:00
trubadurix
23 August, 2016, 6:16 PM UTC

okay im getting irritated by league rewards expired

i log on most every day !  the first i do is catacomb

build units then i click paragon and then i go black

marked and collect my rewards this is my rutine

i never do anything else before i do these 3 things

yet again and again i get rewards expired

so either plarium fix it or give me the units

every time i show screenshots

this one i deffenently didnt miss out on

collecting my rewards did it yesterday and today

look at this amount of expired rewards just stupid

 regards trubadurix

http://prntscr.com/c9gutk


Our devs will figure out why they show up for players who collect them daily. I can recommend you to track those you apply to make sure you shouldn't have any expired. 

UTC +0:00
Rodeo
24 August, 2016, 6:32 PM UTC

Fair Fight over holding Hamlet:


I have been observing the Hamlet and its level over a period of time now.


A Particular hamlet is visible only to a a Particular range of  Castles. Currently that range is too broad.

This does not allow players to have a fair challenge at the Hamlets.

For Example:

Lets say a particular Hamlet is visible to the following range of Levels ( Level 54 to  Level 69). This does not allow  a Level 54 player to challenge and compete with the players at level 69.There will not be a fair Fight.


My suggestion is Narrow down the range of visibility to a difference of 5 Levels. 


Declined. We can't create so many groups of Hamlets. Server needs to track and keep information about all groups, and making more of them would raise the load.





UTC +5:00
Rodeo
25 August, 2016, 10:51 AM UTC

Rodeo said:


Another Suggestion:


It will be good to have an option to send units from Catacomb to my own castle.


But you already have this option.

We could send units only from castle to catacomb not the other way around.


Unable to paste the screenshot just like before.Please refer below screenshot: Yellow arrow is possible, not the red Arrow.


http://image.prntscr.com/image/373a48fec28843dc95a4d06254921848.jpg


Send - Sends them to Catacombs.

Recall - Sends them to Castle.

UTC +5:00
Rodeo
25 August, 2016, 10:53 AM UTC

Rodeo said:


Fair Fight over holding Hamlet:


I have been observing the Hamlet and its level over a period of time now.


A Particular hamlet is visible only to a a Particular range of  Castles. Currently that range is too broad.

This does not allow players to have a fair challenge at the Hamlets.

For Example:

Lets say a particular Hamlet is visible to the following range of Levels ( Level 54 to  Level 69). This does not allow  a Level 54 player to challenge and compete with the players at level 69.There will not be a fair Fight.


My suggestion is Narrow down the range of visibility to a difference of 5 Levels. 


Declined. We can't create so many groups of Hamlets. Server needs to track and keep information about all groups, and making more of them would raise the load.





My suggestion is only to narrow down the range of visibility not to increase the number of hamlets


You wouldn't be able to see many of them in that case. It's not efficient.
UTC +5:00
1720850 users registered; 42319 topics; 270811 posts; our newest member:kapiton61