Coralition Ravages KNIGHTS TEMPLAR 2

32 Replies
Lord Oberon
Administrator
1 July, 2015, 12:18 PM UTC

MADNESS GRIPS THE LANDS

Check the latest Stormfall Chronicle episode here

Discuss below and have fun!

P.S. More episodes -> http://plarium.com/en/strategy-games/stormfall-age-of-war/chronicle/

 

Oberon, Heir of Veyon, Scion of the Firstborn, Lord Regent of Stormfall
UTC +2:00
M.BlackStarVega
1 July, 2015, 4:44 PM UTC

Such a Biased reporter you are.

 

Where is the article about KoC 1 Losing all of Theire beacons to the point where they have just a couple of level 1 beacons THAT keep being taken over by other leagues?

 


DO you WorK Fairly and Properly

 

 

 


KoC 1 has 1 Beacon. The league that was in number 1 for the Longest time has 1 beacons at the moment.

 

KT II, has 2. And I'm sure KT II will have more (Like KoC 1 will regain what they lost).

 

KT II, is in 6th place, KoC 1 is off on the 3rd page somewhere.

 

 

 


I swear...

Fighter Black Star Vega, Knights Templar.Warrior UNI
UTC +0:00
Geoff
1 July, 2015, 5:01 PM UTC

nothing like being disconnected 

UTC +0:00
Coregasm
1 July, 2015, 8:36 PM UTC

The difference is the damage we have done we have done through strategy and it has wrought, The offensive attacks you make are the three same people whose armies they bought.

Credit Cards are the only reason the amount damage "you" inflicted, you take advantage of old men with lots of money who play this game like a slot machine in a casino.

Good Article as always!

UTC +0:00
M.BlackStarVega
1 July, 2015, 10:08 PM UTC

Well there is nothing anybody from KT can say to argue your point Corgy. 

So I Won't say anything about it cause nobody will believe me or anybody else, so it's pointless.

 

All I'm saying is that, Sure... it's perfectly fine for anybody such as the person who makes the article to say that KT II lost most of there beacons, but be Fair on the account that KoC 1 lost their beacons too.

(Not sure who lost beacons first between KT II and KoC 1 for example, but that's a moot point).

Any "Observer" could/would/should see that Lord Oberon (who as far as I know, has nothing to do with the Stormfall Chronicle), And the creator of the Stormfall Chronicals is very much so Biased, or at least some what influenced towards "KT's enemies".

 

And if that is gonna be so, then fine, but like I said again, be fair about it. I would't be saying anything about "this" if I felt that everything was shown fairly to the public. It's just sad. It makes Some people think that Lord Oberon and the Reporter here are members of your league. (which I'm sure isn't the case, but it's hard to believe other wise), It's just my opinion about the matter.

Got to be fair.

Speaking of "money"...... Your fire bomb user (I'm sure you know who I'm talking about) Uses more fire balls then anything I've ever seen. You obviously need Money to spend the kind of fire ball he uses.

 

If he'd use his money for Troops intead of fire bombs...maybe he would have a great big army as well....instead of using fire balls all the time.


BUT, it's "his choice"...if that's how he wants to spend his money...then so be it.

If other people want to use there money to win in a War game... then so be that to.

 

As far as I can remember, KoC during a time of Peace (or even war for that matter), never had Any problems with Any of IT"S members using there money for troops to insure KoC was Dominant.

 

Can't argue that fact.

Fighter Black Star Vega, Knights Templar.Warrior UNI
UTC +0:00
djmoody
1 July, 2015, 11:49 PM UTC

So far these articles have been pretty clearly without biased and well written.

This guy/girl spends their own private time to write up interesting stuff for people to read. For their troubles they get criticised and flamed - not cool. We aren't talking about the NY Times here with hundreds of journalists

I am sure they will get to other news in time, give them half a chance before you jump down their neck.

Everyone has a right to an opinion. No one has a right to their opinion being respected by other if it can't be backed up with rational and logic explanation
UTC +0:00
M.BlackStarVega
2 July, 2015, 12:40 AM UTC

djmoody said:

So far these articles have been pretty clearly without biased and well written.

This guy/girl spends their own private time to write up interesting stuff for people to read. For their troubles they get criticised and flamed - not cool. We aren't talking about the NY Times here with hundreds of journalists

I am sure they will get to other news in time, give them half a chance before you jump down their neck.

"Flamed"...wow.. ....On another note on that word..I haven't seen it in Years!

I used to say it a lot..but I forgot where...... Hmm!!

 

 

* Anyway, I respect your Opinion DJmoody, but I will have to disagree... especially when others feel that it's biased. 
Obviously being the person on the "defense" here I'm protecting my league and standing up for it. (Like I expect anybody to do anyway).

 

 

Unless this is gonna be a 1 side Media Circus (In which case, that would make perfect sense), I'm saying what I feel is right/fair. You can't just post 1 side of the story, the downfall of a league and everything like that, with out the Other half which took just as much Losses.

Everything considering, that in itself is biased.

 

Now I fully expect that when this is all over (yeah right, lol) the end result should be biased or at least to the point where the article writer says good/bad things about all leagues involved.

 

This article isn't fair on the side of KT and I'm defending my league because of it. If your gonna Write an article, do it right... and say points on Both sides of everybody involved, not 1. 

 

If the article deserves to be "Flamed", I'll be the one to do it.

Call my a crier all you want to about it, but like I said, I expect Anybody from Any league to defend their league. Period.

Fighter Black Star Vega, Knights Templar.Warrior UNI
UTC +0:00
Rhymenoceros
2 July, 2015, 11:41 AM UTC

I could care less who is winning or losing, but don't you guys think that maybe next week's article will be about KT taking some beacons? Any story is written in chapters, not all at once. Just saying.

UTC +0:00
M.BlackStarVega
2 July, 2015, 4:56 PM UTC

Rhymenoceros said:

I could care less who is winning or losing, but don't you guys think that maybe next week's article will be about KT taking some beacons? Any story is written in chapters, not all at once. Just saying.

For some reason, I Highly doubt that.

Fighter Black Star Vega, Knights Templar.Warrior UNI
UTC +0:00
Sacred
4 July, 2015, 4:40 AM UTC

Why have I read nothing about Knights of Camalot losing all their beacons or King of Kings loosing all but three of their beacons? How about Knight's of Camelot going from #1 all the way down to 17th?

Where is the unbiased reporting? Well you know since there are screen shots of the beacon hits, the reporter must be in one of the coalition leagues, 

You are just trying to drag one of the KT leagues down so you can feel better. That is the only reason that I can think of for posting this garbage.

 

UTC +0:00
Obèron
4 July, 2015, 5:44 AM UTC

KoC1 has given away some of those beacons. KoC1 was planning on only keeping 4... this was already known for a while now by lots of leagues (not the exact number of beacons, but the intended territory giveaway)

 

So if you want a "story" it's: "KT took 4 whole beacons with $60,000". I guess it would be interesting... but honestly KT, trying to brag about beating a league that was giving away its beacons? Then doing it with a credit card...

 

I don't think we should promote that kind of behavior. Otherwise it's like saying: "Want to make a difference, want to be noticed? PAY US!" That's not a game... On a side note, I bet KT is fun to play Chess with: "I'll pay you $50 to remove that queen this game".   "YAYYYYYY".   "HAH, I owned you, I'm so smart, that was the best hour of my life, I'm going to go brag about it to my wife."   LOL

 

BTW, with all this beacon counting.. how many did KT lose? How many did its league of alts lose? Well... you seem to be doing well...

UTC +0:00
Sacred
4 July, 2015, 11:27 AM UTC

Obèron said:

KoC1 has given away some of those beacons. KoC1 was planning on only keeping 4... this was already known for a while now by lots of leagues (not the exact number of beacons, but the intended territory giveaway)

Huh? Not a chance this is a true story. I guess by the same reasoning, KT was planning on giving up all but three of the beacons they have.

So if you want a "story" it's: "KT took 4 whole beacons with $60,000". I guess it would be interesting... but honestly KT, trying to brag about beating a league that was giving away its beacons? Then doing it with a credit card...

If you truly read my post you would notice I was not bragging at all, just asking the reporter to quit spinning storys about KT and writing something about the other side of this war. All I read was KT2 got smashed, look at how great, the great alliance is. If you need screen shots from the other side, I am sure we have a few floating around still.

I don't think we should promote that kind of behavior. Otherwise it's like saying: "Want to make a difference, want to be noticed? PAY US!" That's not a game... On a side note, I bet KT is fun to play Chess with: "I'll pay you $50 to remove that queen this game".   "YAYYYYYY".   "HAH, I owned you, I'm so smart, that was the best hour of my life, I'm going to go brag about it to my wife."   LOL

Promote what kind of behavior, being honest and fair in reporting to the rest of the Stormfall community in what is really happening? That is seventeen leagues ganging up on one league to prove how butt hurt they are? 

I was not bragging anywhere in my post, just asking why the Stormfall community had not heard anything about the other side of this war.

BTW, with all this beacon counting.. how many did KT lose? How many did its league of alts lose? Well... you seem to be doing well...

They kept the beacons that were important to them. Unfortunately the same can't be said for Knights of Camelot. Actually league chat and teamspeak are pretty jovial. 

 

UTC +0:00
Obèron
4 July, 2015, 1:21 PM UTC

Sacred said:

They kept the beacons that were important to them. Unfortunately the same can't be said for Knights of Camelot. Actually league chat and teamspeak are pretty jovial. 

 

Well... every time I speak to a KT member, it's a different story. Complete opposites sometimes. Then when told their other member said this, you get "let me check with my marshal", end of transmission. LOL.

 

Either way, 

 

Sacred said:

Huh? Not a chance this is a true story. I guess by the same reasoning, KT was planning on giving up all but three of the beacons they have.

 

KT had spies, you knew all along. Just because you personally didn't, means nothing. Back to the above point I made: KT doesn't know what KT's doing.

The difference with KT's story is, they kept taking back "the ones they were giving up",

 

 

You still forgot to refute the "real money" issue here. So... maybe we should ask Plarium for some stats on how much was spent. Then we can write that accurate article "KT spends $60,000+ to stay in war". Then again, we both know how bad that looks for KT and the game itself. I look forward to your next house payment.

UTC +0:00
M.BlackStarVega
4 July, 2015, 6:43 PM UTC

Getting hurt over a "money" situation again?

 

Again, nobody will comment on the 2 points I made about KoC having a "money" guy within their ranks, but he chooses to use his money his own way in this War. (Fine), His money, his rules.

 

Just like KT has there money people, except at least we have users over here that could/would use their money for Troops that actually do a lot more "actions" then just ...you know.."Fire Bombing" everybody/everything.

Point is, we can't stop people who want to use money to sway the war, there is no doubt about that.

 

 

Now I don't know if KoC 1 Wanted to give up those beacons, so they were less defended, (I don't know if it can be Proven) But That doesn't Matter.

 

KoC 1 still lost there beacons and they are OFF the front page. And it was Due to KT. There is no such article or even a Mention of the fact, which is suspicious enough in itself.

 

Don't be dull minded and say that this article was Not (Mostly 1 sided), because it Obviously was.

 

Get info on Both Sides not just 1.

 

After all, if people wanted to get involved in this war (who just may happen to be new people for example) and they see an article like this..... they aren't gonna join the Losing end obviously.

This "Article" certainly didn't make KT recruiting anybody any easier, (Thanks A lot).

 

 

"You still forgot to refute the "real money" issue here. So... maybe we should ask Plarium for some stats on how much was spent. Then we can write that accurate article "KT spends $60,000+ to stay in war". Then again, we both know how bad that looks for KT and the game itself. I look forward to your next house payment."

 

 

Wishfull thinking, let's do this in the "real world" and try to be as "realistic" as possible here. You know Plarium woudln't give out such info.

Like I said, we can't stop people from spending money. You guys spend money, fine. We spend money, fine. What ever tips the scales of the battle, fine. It's a war game.    There wasn't any complaints when coiners were all In KoC a year ago dominating (Yet I say again), Oh no issues there.

 

 

 

Be Fair,  Nathan McDonald

Fighter Black Star Vega, Knights Templar.Warrior UNI
UTC +0:00
BiohazarD
Moderator
5 July, 2015, 12:44 AM UTC

Rhymenoceros said:

I could care less who is winning or losing, but don't you guys think that maybe next week's article will be about KT taking some beacons? Any story is written in chapters, not all at once. Just saying.

For a little balance, here are some screenshots of kt taking beacons.  Note nearly all of the troops involved in these attacks were from roane, the other players involved sent almost nothing judging by their place in rankings. 

Beacon 121

Beacon 120

Beacon 65

Beacon 91

Beacon 15

 

Roane also attempted to take beacon 128 of FoH. 

All of these attacks but the ones on beacon 15 used Roane's troops, which he bought back several times.  The total amount he spent on these was around 5 million sapphires ($25,000/€22,500). 

So good work KT, another $300,000 or so and you'll take out the coalition's beacons.  But hey, it's your money, so if you think it's worth that then by all means spend away. 

 

UTC +0:00
M.BlackStarVega
5 July, 2015, 2:10 AM UTC

I nominate Biohazard To be a reporter on the Stormfall Chronicals ! ! 

 

*shrugs* I guess what I say about people who uses "money" is just ignored.

 

If you guys don't mind losing beacons/troops and what ever else, then the people who spend the money for it to make sure it happeneds won't mind either.

Everybody will be happy.

Fighter Black Star Vega, Knights Templar.Warrior UNI
UTC +0:00
Sacred
5 July, 2015, 7:56 PM UTC

Jealous Biohard?

UTC +0:00
BiohazarD
Moderator
5 July, 2015, 10:15 PM UTC

Sacred said:

Jealous Biohard?

Jealous of what?  I have better things to do with my money.

UTC +0:00
Obèron
6 July, 2015, 8:25 AM UTC

I would be flattered that someone spent $25,000 on you, and failed.

 

It's like buying a car and wrecking it to prove they are better at a virtual game than you. IT'S HILARIOUS.

UTC +0:00
WilliamWallace
6 July, 2015, 2:12 PM UTC

I am amused by all of this, and want to shed a little light for you all that may not know.  Stormfall Chronicles, written by Nate MacDonald is actually Sarrgon of KOK.  One of the comments above written by Rhymenoceros to support his blog is one of his alts that has since changed its game name and hides in another league.  Don't take this stuff too seriously people.  Oh yah, and just a note on the last point in the blog, don't be so self centered.  Most of the game is not affected by this war.  KT is 4 leagues, the Coralition is another 10 leagues.  Then there are the other several hundred leagues that are happy to sit by and just watch you guys spend your money and beat the piss out of each other.  Not affected by your war at all.

UTC +0:00
1718936 users registered; 42083 topics; 269749 posts; our newest member:iamsewsweet