All Categories

Saga Quests

Saga Quests

Search
Moderators for Stormfall: Age of War wanted
May 18, 2018, 18:3205/18/18
08/14/15
59

Saga Quests

Hello Lords and Ladies!

I am eager to hear your opinion on the Saga Quests. Do you find them useful? Would you like to see more Saga Quests added in the future eventually?Since we get higher and higher BG levels, I`d be happy to see more (new) Saga Quests to appear in the near future. 

Your thoughts?

Views
7k
Comments
12
Comments
May 19, 2018, 15:0605/19/18
12/18/14
1835

Yes I don't think initially Plarium intended BG levels to be so high - they keep adding levels but give us no new saga BG's


I wouldn't hold my breath for new ones though they never seem to want to give us something for nothing
May 19, 2018, 15:1405/19/18
07/25/15
2634

Jezebel said:


Yes I don't think initially Plarium intended BG levels to be so high - they keep adding levels but give us no new saga BG's


I wouldn't hold my breath for new ones though they never seem to want to give us something for nothing

Well Saga quests require a bit more effort than just raise levels ....to make happen.... effort equals cost....  after all :p




May 19, 2018, 15:1905/19/18
12/18/14
1835
Gadheras said:

Jezebel said:


Yes I don't think initially Plarium intended BG levels to be so high - they keep adding levels but give us no new saga BG's


I wouldn't hold my breath for new ones though they never seem to want to give us something for nothing

Well Saga quests require a bit more effort than just raise levels ....to make happen.... effort equals cost....  after all :p




yeah but those we can plug away at senselessly with fodder and eventually get some nice troops 
May 20, 2018, 16:3705/20/18
04/10/15
1437

yep could be interesting more saga levels

actually i dont know what to do with my wraiths ... :p

REgards

May 21, 2018, 09:0405/21/18
08/30/17
221

Hi !


Will be nice to have some new lvls on Saga Quests, pls feel free to add this post in Suggestions thread too...



Best regards!

Bogdan
May 21, 2018, 13:4205/21/18
02/29/16
5605

Hello, Lords and Ladies! 

Though many of you are interested in new Saga Quests, devs don't plan to add any for now.

They're not going to make any changes at all to BGs in the near future as they're focused on the tasks with the higher priority (like Beacons, move to the new engine).
May 22, 2018, 04:4405/22/18
03/20/14
493

If i remember correctly the saga quests were about 4 to 1 in power compared to normal BG lvl


lvl10 quest was as strong as a normal lvl40


So take a saga quest of lvl 100? you would wanna hope the guaranteed pay from them would be massive, as you are hiting a BG with the power of a lvl 400 BG.
May 23, 2018, 23:5305/23/18
08/21/14
464

I think Stewart has a good point.  Also, Saga Quests are not part of the bank.  Therefore, the most economical way to hit them is with wraiths, which takes FOREVER and a day and then some in the 20s.



The most efficient BG levels are 70-90, though 50s and 60s are still pretty good.   Above BG 100, the efficiency drops.  While the minimum bank level in resources increases by 7% per level, I believe the maximum payout increases at less than 7% per level, and by the time you're in the 150s, and certainly at 190 (or is it 200 now?), the maximum payout is less than the minimum bank needed to trigger a large payout, which means you will never empty the bank in the higher BGs.  The law of diminishing returns at those high levels really doesn't make it worth it, IMO.


To receive as many efficient BGs as possible, you should ideally stop increasing your BG levels after 100 or so.   Since the only way to access new Saga Quests is to increase your BG levels by 4 over the previous SQ, going above BG100 to access any added SQs will get increasingly inefficient, and result in fewer efficient BG levels.

Without food restrictions, at those high levels, its really far better to just do


As far as the legendary units, you are still likely to get more power in troops alone by sticking with


Still, if new SQs were added, there would be no requirement to do them, so by all means, add them.  Maybe I'm missing something, but I only see a disadvantage in doing them.  To each their own.

May 24, 2018, 08:1505/24/18
May 24, 2018, 08:42(edited)
02/28/16
131

Last column. Profit without maxed out Lost Arts, crystals or hero items; paragon or Dragon Stone activated; without +10/+20/+50% on; and without few tricks that can even further increase said profit.

Saga Quests are profitable and imho that's the main reason why new ones weren't added when BGs went above 100 and why we wont see them added to the game in the future.
May 26, 2018, 05:2205/26/18
08/21/14
464
Profitable once.   Efficient BGs are profitable forever.
May 26, 2018, 07:2705/26/18
10/31/14
1897
Aegon Targaryen said:

I think Stewart has a good point.  Also, Saga Quests are not part of the bank.  Therefore, the most economical way to hit them is with wraiths, which takes FOREVER and a day and then some in the 20s.



The most efficient BG levels are 70-90, though 50s and 60s are still pretty good.   Above BG 100, the efficiency drops.  While the minimum bank level in resources increases by 7% per level, I believe the maximum payout increases at less than 7% per level, and by the time you're in the 150s, and certainly at 190 (or is it 200 now?), the maximum payout is less than the minimum bank needed to trigger a large payout, which means you will never empty the bank in the higher BGs.  The law of diminishing returns at those high levels really doesn't make it worth it, IMO.


To receive as many efficient BGs as possible, you should ideally stop increasing your BG levels after 100 or so.   Since the only way to access new Saga Quests is to increase your BG levels by 4 over the previous SQ, going above BG100 to access any added SQs will get increasingly inefficient, and result in fewer efficient BG levels.

Without food restrictions, at those high levels, its really far better to just do


As far as the legendary units, you are still likely to get more power in troops alone by sticking with


Still, if new SQs were added, there would be no requirement to do them, so by all means, add them.  Maybe I'm missing something, but I only see a disadvantage in doing them.  To each their own.

You are very smart
The topic is locked. You cannot post comments.