Camulos said:
I think the point is that he might like to do more in order to clear the lower end bgs, but would like an easier way to dispose of rubbish rewards without being expected to pay to do so. Surely not getting the mooncoins is enough of a penalty for discarding items quickly?
We have option to discard unopened chests so why dont we have discard on all items? We are not gaining anything but crap filling up all the alloted spaces, i wouldnt mind that in itself but without a discard option it just halts me doing as many bgs i can especially when even the lowest items take 7 mins to dispose of, i honestly dont know why there is no discard option on all items..
Simple, Plarium wants that you buy slots. It's so obvious, and Alyona confirmed that on the other thread - not explicitly, ofc.Camulos said:
I think the point is that he might like to do more in order to clear the lower end bgs, but would like an easier way to dispose of rubbish rewards without being expected to pay to do so. Surely not getting the mooncoins is enough of a penalty for discarding items quickly?We have option to discard unopened chests so why dont we have discard on all items? We are not gaining anything but crap filling up all the alloted spaces, i wouldnt mind that in itself but without a discard option it just halts me doing as many bgs i can especially when even the lowest items take 7 mins to dispose of, i honestly dont know why there is no discard option on all items..
Pallus said:
We have option to discard unopened chests so why dont we have discard on all items? We are not gaining anything but crap filling up all the alloted spaces, i wouldnt mind that in itself but without a discard option it just halts me doing as many bgs i can especially when even the lowest items take 7 mins to dispose of, i honestly dont know why there is no discard option on all items..
which doubts, you have to fill in everything, so when you see something nice rather than throw it buys slots.... is a strategic game
(yes for plarium)
Drogar61 said:
Alyona Kolomiitseva said:
Your sentence really isn't answer on my question.Drogar61 said:
Unfortunately, we are not planning to add them for now.What is the sense of new BG levels without new Saga Quests?
Rhetorical questions don't suppose to be answered at all. My intention was to inform you of our future plans in this direction.
Alyona Kolomiitseva said:
Drogar61 said:
Alyona Kolomiitseva said:
Your sentence really isn't answer on my question.Drogar61 said:
Unfortunately, we are not planning to add them for now.What is the sense of new BG levels without new Saga Quests?
Rhetorical questions don't suppose to be answered at all. My intention was to inform you of our future plans in this direction.
Question wasn't rhetorical for me, but obvious it was for you. I believe that right answer is: THERE IS NO BENEFIT.
Have you plan to still give us nothing and expect thank you for that, is rhetorical question.Drogar61 said:
Question wasn't rhetorical for me, but obvious it was for you. I believe that right answer is: THERE IS NO BENEFIT.
Have you plan to still give us nothing and expect thank you for that, is rhetorical question.
Why do you think there's no benefit? Players usually prefer hitting top level BGs, because they are sure that they will get higher rewards from there. And we have added even more levels, which means even more rewards from players. Is it so bad? Or you would prefer no new levels at all?
The sense of doing BGs is not in Saga Quests, but in strengthening your army. I'm sure you could have much more fun with new Saga Quests, but there won't be any. However you still can just ignore the new levels if you don't like them much The majority of our players is enjoying them, so maybe you also will, if you give them a try?For long time we eliminated word reward from BG tournament and changed it with payout, because every payout will cost you, which isn't any benefit.
BG levels were/are keys for Saga Quests, only place where you really can get reward. So we (or at least me) are wondering why you didn't make new Saga Quests. Simple, it would be logical, as part of well balanced game as Stormfall is, by your words. Without Saga QUests you are loosing that balance.
Level 125 requires 256 M of resources, and level 140 requires 408 M. First number is terrible, and about second I don't want to talk.
To make this simpler
For 140 level you have to kill 16787 Dragons, and in turn to loose about 840 Dragons with payout
For 125 level you have to kill 10534 Dragons, and in turn to loose about 527 Dragons with payout
For 100 level you have to kill 5228 Dragons, and in turn to loose about 262 Dragons with payout
You re-asked me about benefit. For me is obvious that I will choose 2 BGs on 100 level rather than one on 140 level.
And, yes for me this has no benefit. With appropriate Saga Quests maybe I could see benefit.