All Categories

More BG sux

More BG sux

Search
Moderators for Stormfall: Age of War wanted
Apr 29, 2016, 13:5104/29/16
2

More BG sux

Ok so now we have about 60 bgs a day, thats fine in itself but im finding many of the ones i get are lev 1 upto lev 12 which equates to about 3 pages of low end bgs. Of course i can do them easily however its not doing them that bothers me its all the low end hero items that come with each one i do. I am unable to do many gs each day due to the crap that fills the spaces in the hero inventory, thst using both the main and temporary spaces provided, Before anyone suggests buying more space dont as i am not in position to do that... Why on earth is there no discard option so i can destroy excess junk?
Views
3k
Comments
18
Comments
Apr 29, 2016, 13:5404/29/16
48
Or sell multiple items at once.
Alyona KolomiitsevaCommunity Manager
May 5, 2016, 07:4605/05/16
09/17/15
8278
You are not forced to complete more BGs. You have an option, but it's up to you how to use it.
May 5, 2016, 09:5305/05/16
74
I think the point is that he might like to do more in order to clear the lower end bgs, but would like an easier way to dispose of rubbish rewards without being expected to pay to do so. Surely not getting the mooncoins is enough of a penalty for discarding items quickly?
May 5, 2016, 10:2305/05/16
718

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:


You are not forced to complete more BGs. You have an option, but it's up to you how to use it.

real option is play this game, coherence avoids talk bullshit

May 5, 2016, 11:4905/05/16
2

Camulos said:


I think the point is that he might like to do more in order to clear the lower end bgs, but would like an easier way to dispose of rubbish rewards without being expected to pay to do so. Surely not getting the mooncoins is enough of a penalty for discarding items quickly?

We have option to discard unopened chests so why dont we have discard on all items? We are not gaining anything but crap filling up all the alloted spaces, i wouldnt mind that in itself but without a discard option it just halts me doing as many bgs i can especially when even the lowest items take 7 mins to dispose of, i honestly dont know why there is no discard option on all items..



May 5, 2016, 12:0605/05/16
06/22/14
448
Pallus said:

Camulos said:


I think the point is that he might like to do more in order to clear the lower end bgs, but would like an easier way to dispose of rubbish rewards without being expected to pay to do so. Surely not getting the mooncoins is enough of a penalty for discarding items quickly?

We have option to discard unopened chests so why dont we have discard on all items? We are not gaining anything but crap filling up all the alloted spaces, i wouldnt mind that in itself but without a discard option it just halts me doing as many bgs i can especially when even the lowest items take 7 mins to dispose of, i honestly dont know why there is no discard option on all items..


Simple, Plarium wants that you buy slots. It's so obvious, and Alyona confirmed that on the other thread - not explicitly, ofc.
May 5, 2016, 23:5305/05/16
12/13/14
1282
Try using the temporary storage slots and it will self-discard after 2 days
May 6, 2016, 00:0305/06/16
718

Pallus said:



We have option to discard unopened chests so why dont we have discard on all items? We are not gaining anything but crap filling up all the alloted spaces, i wouldnt mind that in itself but without a discard option it just halts me doing as many bgs i can especially when even the lowest items take 7 mins to dispose of, i honestly dont know why there is no discard option on all items..



which doubts, you have to fill in everything, so when you see something nice rather than throw it buys slots.... is a strategic game

  (yes for plarium)

May 7, 2016, 18:4105/07/16
04/10/15
1437

Hi all

what i miss in this new bg mass is the advice of scribe with the new bgs when u finish one

hope they can change this

Regards
May 10, 2016, 14:2805/10/16
12/18/14
1835
Battle Grounds go beyond level 125 now, what is the new top level bg?  Also no new Saga Quest bg?
May 10, 2016, 16:0305/10/16
06/22/14
448

What is the sense of new BG levels without new Saga Quests?

May 10, 2016, 19:4505/10/16
12/09/15
313
Thee is 15 more BGs. So max level is 140.
Alyona KolomiitsevaCommunity Manager
May 11, 2016, 11:3805/11/16
09/17/15
8278
Drogar61 said:

What is the sense of new BG levels without new Saga Quests?

Unfortunately, we are not planning to add them for now.
May 11, 2016, 12:0305/11/16
06/22/14
448
Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Drogar61 said:

What is the sense of new BG levels without new Saga Quests?

Unfortunately, we are not planning to add them for now.
Your sentence really isn't answer on my question.
Alyona KolomiitsevaCommunity Manager
May 12, 2016, 07:5105/12/16
09/17/15
8278

Drogar61 said:


Alyona Kolomiitseva said:


Drogar61 said:


What is the sense of new BG levels without new Saga Quests?

Unfortunately, we are not planning to add them for now.
Your sentence really isn't answer on my question.

Rhetorical questions don't suppose to be answered at all. My intention was to inform you of our future plans in this direction.

 
May 12, 2016, 20:5305/12/16
May 12, 2016, 20:55(edited)
06/22/14
448

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:


Drogar61 said:


Alyona Kolomiitseva said:


Drogar61 said:


What is the sense of new BG levels without new Saga Quests?

Unfortunately, we are not planning to add them for now.
Your sentence really isn't answer on my question.

Rhetorical questions don't suppose to be answered at all. My intention was to inform you of our future plans in this direction.

 

Question wasn't rhetorical for me, but obvious it was for you. I believe that right answer is: THERE IS NO BENEFIT.

Have you plan to still give us nothing and expect thank you for that, is rhetorical question.
Alyona KolomiitsevaCommunity Manager
May 13, 2016, 06:4305/13/16
09/17/15
8278

Drogar61 said:



Question wasn't rhetorical for me, but obvious it was for you. I believe that right answer is: THERE IS NO BENEFIT.

Have you plan to still give us nothing and expect thank you for that, is rhetorical question.

Why do you think there's no benefit? Players usually prefer hitting top level BGs, because they are sure that they will get higher rewards from there. And we have added even more levels, which means even more rewards from players. Is it so bad? Or you would prefer no new levels at all? 

The sense of doing BGs is not in Saga Quests, but in strengthening your army. I'm sure you could have much more fun with new Saga Quests, but there won't be any. However you still can just ignore the new levels if you don't like them much   The majority of our players is enjoying them, so maybe you also will, if you give them a try?
May 13, 2016, 13:1905/13/16
06/22/14
448

For long time we eliminated word reward from BG tournament and changed it with payout, because every payout will cost you, which isn't any benefit.

BG levels were/are keys for Saga Quests, only place where you really can get reward. So we (or at least me) are wondering why you didn't make new Saga Quests. Simple, it would be logical, as part of well balanced game as Stormfall is, by your words. Without Saga QUests you are loosing that balance.


Level 125 requires 256 M of resources, and level 140 requires 408 M. First number is terrible, and about second I don't want to talk.

To make this simpler

For 140 level you have to kill 16787 Dragons, and in turn to loose about 840 Dragons with payout

For 125 level you have to kill 10534 Dragons, and in turn to loose about 527 Dragons with payout

For 100 level you have to kill 5228 Dragons, and in turn to loose about 262 Dragons with payout

You re-asked me about benefit. For me is obvious that I will choose 2 BGs on 100 level rather than one on 140 level.

And, yes for me this has no benefit. With appropriate Saga Quests maybe I could see benefit.