I just handed off command of my league to one of my captains.
unless plarium has some compelling evidence of a 180 turnaround for 2017 i dont really see myself spending much time on this game anymore.
best of luck to everyone.
IronApex Turok said:
I just handed off command of my league to one of my captains.
unless plarium has some compelling evidence of a 180 turnaround for 2017 i dont really see myself spending much time on this game anymore.
best of luck to everyone.
IronApex
Why have you decided to leave, Lord IronApex?
Eugenia Misura said:
IronApex Turok said:
I just handed off command of my league to one of my captains.
unless plarium has some compelling evidence of a 180 turnaround for 2017 i dont really see myself spending much time on this game anymore.
best of luck to everyone.
IronApexWhy have you decided to leave, Lord IronApex?
I have a feeling if he told you in sincere words. you would end up ban him on the way out -)
Gadheras said:
Eugenia Misura said:
IronApex Turok said:
I just handed off command of my league to one of my captains.
unless plarium has some compelling evidence of a 180 turnaround for 2017 i dont really see myself spending much time on this game anymore.
best of luck to everyone.
IronApexWhy have you decided to leave, Lord IronApex?
I have a feeling if he told you in sincere words. you would end up ban him on the way out -)
I am sure there is a lot of pressure building up with beacon leagues with a lot of long ago defense and this could upset some leagues. Maybe that is the reason for it.
If it's a constuctive feedback, I'll gladly listen everybody.Eugenia Misura said:
IronApex Turok said:
I just handed off command of my league to one of my captains.
unless plarium has some compelling evidence of a 180 turnaround for 2017 i dont really see myself spending much time on this game anymore.
best of luck to everyone.
IronApexWhy have you decided to leave, Lord IronApex?
I have a feeling if he told you in sincere words. you would end up ban him on the way out -)
I think a whole lot of it comes down to the feeling Plarium doesn't listen to the players.Gadheras said:If it's a constuctive feedback, I'll gladly listen everybody.Eugenia Misura said:
IronApex Turok said:
I just handed off command of my league to one of my captains.
unless plarium has some compelling evidence of a 180 turnaround for 2017 i dont really see myself spending much time on this game anymore.
best of luck to everyone.
IronApexWhy have you decided to leave, Lord IronApex?
I have a feeling if he told you in sincere words. you would end up ban him on the way out -)
ive given 600 some posts of constructive feed back... you have yet to listen.If it's a constuctive feedback, I'll gladly listen everybody.
After another war of the big leagues the stagnation was again broken by the Beacon Massacre (I myself do not like the update but i will explain it).
Small leagues have now got brave enough to take down beacons(another strategy in play) since there will be minimum losses on their investment. This made the activity surge again. Some league that were not able to get the revenge from the beacon leagues now had an open chance. This also helped out in flushing beacons with inactive defense adding to the balance. Hence clearing out the capacity of some league to hold a lot of beacons.
I did still say the frequency is more for the beacon massacre but I see this as bringing balance and removing stagnation in the game, giving the smaller league option to take beacons and hold them.
Warrior said:
After another war of the big leagues the stagnation was again broken by the Beacon Massacre (I myself do not like the update but i will explain it).
Small leagues have now got brave enough to take down beacons(another strategy in play) since there will be minimum losses on their investment. This made the activity surge again. Some league that were not able to get the revenge from the beacon leagues now had an open chance. This also helped out in flushing beacons with inactive defense adding to the balance. Hence clearing out the capacity of some league to hold a lot of beacons.
I did still say the frequency is more for the beacon massacre but I see this as bringing balance and removing stagnation in the game, giving the smaller league option to take beacons and hold them.
Who do you think will be targeted once the top 10 have been wiped out by Emps massively coined hammer? These small unsuspecting leagues that will not be able to defend against these large offense armies. It takes approximately 1 month to build 1 million in defense, I know thats all I have built for the past year beast and occult defense, so say I have 50 million spread across 3 beacons and the beacons get wiped out I lose 5 million in defense and am behind 5 months of building - no the beacon massacre is not good for the game I have spent the last two years building and rebuilding troops NOT so they can be wiped out that way - if the massacre runs every two to three weeks we will NEVER be able to catch up on building our defenses - hence you will see empty beacons on the server sooner than later - balur will have his day he will hold more beacons than the leagues do.
i might hold on for a bit to see what the ship looks like while it is sinking.That is pretty much what I am doing - we can make popcorn and watch the festivities together!
As i said i do agree on the part of the frequency of the event. The frequency is definitely more but you do also agree that this will help in flushing out the inactive defense from the beacons and making some leagues loose the capability to take more beacons.and players will quit out of frustration - players that would have otherwise stayed in the game
Jezebel said:
Warrior said:
As i said i do agree on the part of the frequency of the event. The frequency is definitely more but you do also agree that this will help in flushing out the inactive defense from the beacons and making some leagues loose the capability to take more beacons.and players will quit out of frustration - players that would have otherwise stayed in the game
Yes...they quite...and every 'quitter' will 'recomand' plarium ...
GG
And their leaving will create a whole new base of inactive defense.Warrior said:As i said i do agree on the part of the frequency of the event. The frequency is definitely more but you do also agree that this will help in flushing out the inactive defense from the beacons and making some leagues loose the capability to take more beacons.and players will quit out of frustration - players that would have otherwise stayed in the game
And the whole new group of people quiting in infrustration are making sure they leave their logins to make things even more messy.
eventually the ones with decent strength left will band together into a league, The 15 bil off and 10 bil def league who will smash down any league trying to hold any beacon on the server. Then you will have 1 league holding 1 beacon in first position in the rankings.
And plarium will get the slow clap of victory from themselves and each other while they tell each other how great they are.
Warrior said:
As i said i do agree on the part of the frequency of the event. The frequency is definitely more but you do also agree that this will help in flushing out the inactive defense from the beacons and making some leagues loose the capability to take more beacons.
It only needs ONE beacon massacre to flush inactives, so how do you justify 2 beacon event and 2 fortress events every month
As for server 2 .... there are no inactives in top leagues so these events just increase the bullying of lower ranked leagues (who stand NO chance of ever actually holding beacons, or upgrading fortresses, so how can you claim it is helping them?)
You are 100% wrong - smell the coffee, this game will only last 4 months before plarium pull the plug
Like they did on the Kongregate servers
***************************************************************************************
However, this is not about the Beacon Massacre, this is about everything
The battlegrounds are worthless because of yellow barring nerfs, and useless mini-payouts
The Tournament rewards are worthless because of new tier structure
Sketches have capped development for non-coiners
Mysterious extra losses from pvp
Active Bots, Hackers and Scammers which drive a double-decker bus thru plarium code - http://prntscr.com/dsn2u2
need we go on?
Well with th demise of Flashplayer, it could be the "last milking" before doomsday.Warrior said:
As i said i do agree on the part of the frequency of the event. The frequency is definitely more but you do also agree that this will help in flushing out the inactive defense from the beacons and making some leagues loose the capability to take more beacons.It only needs ONE beacon massacre to flush inactives, so how do you justify 2 beacon event and 2 fortress events every month
As for server 2 .... there are no inactives in top leagues so these events just increase the bullying of lower ranked leagues (who stand NO chance of ever actually holding beacons, so how can you claim it is helping them?)
You are 100% wrong - smell the coffee, this game will only last 4 months before plarium pull the plug
Like they did on the Kongregate servers
