because Emps wont take big losses on their hammer but they would gladly let Warhawk take that 10 million loss (after revival) to save their own troops, i have seen all the hits and Emps hammer never went in until there would be next to no losses for them after revivalPardon Me I have a question. I thought I knew a lot with regards to beacon, till I receive these question form one of my F online
If a beacon can safely be hit at X amount safely and must be soften to to a value greater or equals X amount. Why would one need to soften it if it has Y amount.
for example if a beacon has 68 mil defense, a few heavy softening are required to bring back the defense back to nearly 50 mil. If these is true then any softener must have offense capable of bringing down some defense right? and the value is calculated from the initial defense found in the beacon using the D= O+D\D right, or any other online calculator? if these is true. then is means running offense lower than the offense capable of causing harm in a beacon is a suicide run? if these is true then...
If so then Emperors need a 120 mil+ softener to run down a 250-450+ million defended beacon. But the looks of screenshot gathered from my intel, there we several hits most lower than 20 mil in offense.
even if we are to assume that Destiny had some 750 mil defense, which an intel has recently shown. Why would Emperors need softeners of they have 1.5 billion offense, and there was a 90% free revival.
I am very confused. Maybe the formula need modifications. Maybe all is not at it seemn.