This topic is closed

News of Increasing League member limit to 300

61 Reply
Alyona Kolomiitseva
Community Manager
17 October, 2016, 9:19 AM UTC
Even the developers don't know what the final number will be. The Leagues will be expanded, that's true. However, it's not in the development yet. 
Plarium Community Manager. Please note that I will be unable to respond to your private messages, review your tickets, or check your account information. All technical issues should be directed to our Support Team at plrm.me/Support_Plarium
UTC +2:00
1
Oracle
17 October, 2016, 11:06 AM UTC
Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Even the developers don't know what the final number will be. The Leagues will be expanded, that's true. However, it's not in the development yet. 
If its not in development then how come its a word of the street ?
Biohazard has killed the forum.
UTC +2:00
0
IronApex Turok
17 October, 2016, 8:34 PM UTC
i recommend you get on the horn with them and show them this thread, community manager.
UTC +0:00
1
djmoody
18 October, 2016, 12:37 AM UTC

2 years ago this would have been great for the server I am on. People opened many sub leagues to try and work around the league limit.

These days there just aren't enough active players to support 300 person leagues. Fairly good chance it could kill the server, with only 2/3 mega leagues left active after mergers (my prediction for 6-9 months post update implementation).

Also players keep moaning about unfair playing field vs the big leagues. Well this isn't going to help game balance is it!!!

Thumbs down from me - given the current state of the servers (from the start of the game would have been a thumbs up).
Everyone has a right to an opinion. No one has a right to their opinion being respected by other if it can't be backed up with rational and logic explanation
UTC +0:00
2
Warrior
18 October, 2016, 4:18 AM UTC
djmoody said:

2 years ago this would have been great for the server I am on. People opened many sub leagues to try and work around the league limit.

These days there just aren't enough active players to support 300 person leagues. Fairly good chance it could kill the server, with only 2/3 mega leagues left active after mergers (my prediction for 6-9 months post update implementation).

Also players keep moaning about unfair playing field vs the big leagues. Well this isn't going to help game balance is it!!!

Thumbs down from me - given the current state of the servers (from the start of the game would have been a thumbs up).
Thanks for supporting the view.. Totally agree.. also since there will still be a single Marshal of the league i am sure there will be a lot of unrest for some leagues to merge with the other even though they might be part or extension of the same league earlier additionally this would also give leagues chance to keep inactive players in the league for defense and numbers. Numbers always have a psychological advantage even if we deny the fact. It will definately kill the balance, which people are still complaining about, in the game
Please Like the Post if you agree or if it helps
UTC +6:00
0
Alyona Kolomiitseva
Community Manager
18 October, 2016, 10:54 AM UTC
oracle said:

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Even the developers don't know what the final number will be. The Leagues will be expanded, that's true. However, it's not in the development yet. 
If its not in development then how come its a word of the street ?
It was suggested by players and accepted by devs. But they didn't start working on it yet.
Plarium Community Manager. Please note that I will be unable to respond to your private messages, review your tickets, or check your account information. All technical issues should be directed to our Support Team at plrm.me/Support_Plarium
UTC +2:00
0
Jezebel
18 October, 2016, 3:10 PM UTC
Warrior said:

djmoody said:

2 years ago this would have been great for the server I am on. People opened many sub leagues to try and work around the league limit.

These days there just aren't enough active players to support 300 person leagues. Fairly good chance it could kill the server, with only 2/3 mega leagues left active after mergers (my prediction for 6-9 months post update implementation).

Also players keep moaning about unfair playing field vs the big leagues. Well this isn't going to help game balance is it!!!

Thumbs down from me - given the current state of the servers (from the start of the game would have been a thumbs up).
Thanks for supporting the view.. Totally agree.. also since there will still be a single Marshal of the league i am sure there will be a lot of unrest for some leagues to merge with the other even though they might be part or extension of the same league earlier additionally this would also give leagues chance to keep inactive players in the league for defense and numbers. Numbers always have a psychological advantage even if we deny the fact. It will definately kill the balance, which people are still complaining about, in the game
This is correct there are not enough active players in the game to support larger leagues.
UTC +0:00
0
JWeiser_FoL
18 October, 2016, 4:24 PM UTC

Just take it up to 200 and call it good so many of the league that have sub leagues can just merge together all the active players :) 

JWeiser_FoL
UTC -6:00
0
Sculptor
18 October, 2016, 4:51 PM UTC

Please don't!


It's hard enough to get new active members because more players quit then new ones arrive. The big leagues allready are to strong because they attract the biggest coiners around. When they get more spots the top leagues get stronger very fast and the "other" leagues get devastated.


At the moment a lot of leagues still have beacons because the big leagues can't hold them all. When this happens the top leagues will take all beacons and the others are left with nothing. Which will result again in bigger players leaving for the bigger leagues.


Please leave a bit of diversity in this game and stop this killing this game by giving the stronger more and more power.

Member of Blue Magic
UTC +0:00
0
JWeiser_FoL
18 October, 2016, 5:12 PM UTC

Sculptor said:


Please don't!


It's hard enough to get new active members because more players quit then new ones arrive. The big leagues allready are to strong because they attract the biggest coiners around. When they get more spots the top leagues get stronger very fast and the "other" leagues get devastated.


At the moment a lot of leagues still have beacons because the big leagues can't hold them all. When this happens the top leagues will take all beacons and the others are left with nothing. Which will result again in bigger players leaving for the bigger leagues.


Please leave a bit of diversity in this game and stop this killing this game by giving the stronger more and more power.

Work some diplomacy with some of the bigger leagues and if this thing happens then maybe your league may be asked to merge into one of the bigger league :)

JWeiser_FoL
UTC -6:00
0
Skycooldude
18 October, 2016, 6:31 PM UTC
how about giving marshal powers to change at which rank beacon info gets realeased (something a majority of leagues want) instead of implementing more member slots for leagues (which it seems the majority is against)
UTC +0:00
3
Daniel
18 October, 2016, 7:24 PM UTC

Skycooldude said:


how about giving marshal powers to change at which rank beacon info gets realeased (something a majority of leagues want) instead of implementing more member slots for leagues (which it seems the majority is against)

Everyone asks for the power to marshal to change the rank of beacon info and no one hears a single word for it.

No one asks for the league expand and it gets into the things that will be done soon.

So i think the way things work here is dont suggest something and it will get done? Suggest it to cancel it? LOL
UTC +1:00
3
exxxe
19 October, 2016, 6:03 AM UTC

Daniel said:


Skycooldude said:


how about giving marshal powers to change at which rank beacon info gets realeased (something a majority of leagues want) instead of implementing more member slots for leagues (which it seems the majority is against)

Everyone asks for the power to marshal to change the rank of beacon info and no one hears a single word for it.

No one asks for the league expand and it gets into the things that will be done soon.

So i think the way things work here is dont suggest something and it will get done? Suggest it to cancel it? LOL

this suggestion is canceled 


if i recall correctly it requires lots of changes to the code and it is very complicated so all they were able to do is to raise the rank only

I'am me and that is what i care about :)
UTC +3:00
0
IronApex Turok
19 October, 2016, 7:39 AM UTC

sounds like if the membership goes  up, leagues are gonna be purging dead members and merging with other leagues.



we could probably shake things into just a handful of leagues
UTC +0:00
0
Alyona Kolomiitseva
Community Manager
19 October, 2016, 8:58 AM UTC

Skycooldude said:


how about giving marshal powers to change at which rank beacon info gets realeased (something a majority of leagues want)

This suggestion was already accepted, but not done yet. 

Edit: just to avoid confusion. I mean we will raise the rank, not give an opportunity to set it. However, it's still not in development, so the idea can be changed.
Plarium Community Manager. Please note that I will be unable to respond to your private messages, review your tickets, or check your account information. All technical issues should be directed to our Support Team at plrm.me/Support_Plarium
UTC +2:00
0
WallyFous
19 October, 2016, 2:02 PM UTC

exxxe said:


this suggestion is canceled 


if i recall correctly it requires lots of changes to the code and it is very complicated so all they were able to do is to raise the rank only

Okay, so then when is it going to be set to only Marshals and Captains can see the troops? 

There is no need for anyone else to see what is in the beacons. Especially bad is the Fighter rank which is used to set up non-officers to use League Attacks. That is like putting a new Lieutenant in charge of a squad and going "I need you to attack that outpost... and here are all of our top secret base maps just because you got a pretty face." 

UTC +0:00
1
exxxe
19 October, 2016, 2:56 PM UTC

WallyFous said:


exxxe said:


this suggestion is canceled 


if i recall correctly it requires lots of changes to the code and it is very complicated so all they were able to do is to raise the rank only

Okay, so then when is it going to be set to only Marshals and Captains can see the troops? 

There is no need for anyone else to see what is in the beacons. Especially bad is the Fighter rank which is used to set up non-officers to use League Attacks. That is like putting a new Lieutenant in charge of a squad and going "I need you to attack that outpost... and here are all of our top secret base maps just because you got a pretty face." 

lord Wallyfous 


the rank in which players can see beacons info will be raised (still dont know how much)


however the ability to let the marshal choose which rank can see the info (or which player) has been canceled 
I'am me and that is what i care about :)
UTC +3:00
0
BiohazarD
Moderator
19 October, 2016, 3:19 PM UTC
exxxe said:

WallyFous said:


exxxe said:


this suggestion is canceled 


if i recall correctly it requires lots of changes to the code and it is very complicated so all they were able to do is to raise the rank only

Okay, so then when is it going to be set to only Marshals and Captains can see the troops? 

There is no need for anyone else to see what is in the beacons. Especially bad is the Fighter rank which is used to set up non-officers to use League Attacks. That is like putting a new Lieutenant in charge of a squad and going "I need you to attack that outpost... and here are all of our top secret base maps just because you got a pretty face." 

lord Wallyfous 


the rank in which players can see beacons info will be raised (still dont know how much)


however the ability to let the marshal choose which rank can see the info (or which player) has been canceled 
The only way that would be helpful is if they raised it to just the captains and marshal. 
Any opinions expressed by me are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of or constitute official statements by Plarium.
UTC +0:00
0
Oracle
19 October, 2016, 7:19 PM UTC

BiohazarD said:


exxxe said:


WallyFous said:


exxxe said:


this suggestion is canceled 


if i recall correctly it requires lots of changes to the code and it is very complicated so all they were able to do is to raise the rank only

Okay, so then when is it going to be set to only Marshals and Captains can see the troops? 

There is no need for anyone else to see what is in the beacons. Especially bad is the Fighter rank which is used to set up non-officers to use League Attacks. That is like putting a new Lieutenant in charge of a squad and going "I need you to attack that outpost... and here are all of our top secret base maps just because you got a pretty face." 

lord Wallyfous 


the rank in which players can see beacons info will be raised (still dont know how much)


however the ability to let the marshal choose which rank can see the info (or which player) has been canceled 
The only way that would be helpful is if they raised it to just the captains and marshal. 

It will be best if everyone can see how much strong his/her league is, raising it is a bad idea. a league a collection of people, countries, or groups that combine for mutual protection or cooperation, a form of alliance that is a standard of truth and trust. If you a marshal can't trust a neophyte who is a foundation, and the core development of a league then why should you trust anyone, let alone your captain. 

raising the level at which defense is shown will results in a lot of distrust, which is already strife in BIG leagues. Just because people can't trust each other, doesn't mean that plarium should feel obliged to bend to such entitlements. BIG league with super ''coiners'' with 300 members will not be possible to achieve for most marshals, as they don't meet the mere credentials of recruiting. 

Having 300 members or more( at least 1000-10K) will solve all problems, including inactivity, dead chats( chats is the backbone of any league), and the coining problems that is strife. 


Biohazard has killed the forum.
UTC +2:00
0
IronApex Turok
19 October, 2016, 8:03 PM UTC

oracle said:


BiohazarD said:


exxxe said:


WallyFous said:


exxxe said:


this suggestion is canceled 


if i recall correctly it requires lots of changes to the code and it is very complicated so all they were able to do is to raise the rank only

Okay, so then when is it going to be set to only Marshals and Captains can see the troops? 

There is no need for anyone else to see what is in the beacons. Especially bad is the Fighter rank which is used to set up non-officers to use League Attacks. That is like putting a new Lieutenant in charge of a squad and going "I need you to attack that outpost... and here are all of our top secret base maps just because you got a pretty face." 

lord Wallyfous 


the rank in which players can see beacons info will be raised (still dont know how much)


however the ability to let the marshal choose which rank can see the info (or which player) has been canceled 
The only way that would be helpful is if they raised it to just the captains and marshal. 

It will be best if everyone can see how much strong his/her league is, raising it is a bad idea. a league a collection of people, countries, or groups that combine for mutual protection or cooperation, a form of alliance that is a standard of truth and trust. If you a marshal can't trust a neophyte who is a foundation, and the core development of a league then why should you trust anyone, let alone your captain. 

raising the level at which defense is shown will results in a lot of distrust, which is already strife in BIG leagues. Just because people can't trust each other, doesn't mean that plarium should feel obliged to bend to such entitlements. BIG league with super ''coiners'' with 300 members will not be possible to achieve for most marshals, as they don't meet the mere credentials of recruiting. 

Having 300 members or more( at least 1000-10K) will solve all problems, including inactivity, dead chats( chats is the backbone of any league), and the coining problems that is strife. 


because my captains have been with me since day one, 4  years ago.  i dont know half of my neophytes. most players never speak in chat.  even up to the rank of guardian, players can still be a mystery.  its pretty easy to change the name of an alt, transport its castle, then bounce into a league and wait til you get rank to see the beacon.   then report back to your main league.


rinse and repeat.....


you could get screen shots of almost any beacon.     could.....can.   i have seen screen shots of many beacons. 
UTC +0:00
0
1782444 users registered; 48530 topics; 287844 posts; our newest member:Baldwin