This topic is closed

News of Increasing League member limit to 300

61 Reply
Warrior
16 October, 2016, 5:09 AM UTC

This is what i have heard from some player in another Plarium game and the developer are trying to implement this. I think we should see how the support on this feature is before they implement this or it will have a similar emotion floating like the one floating due to the Lost Art feature.


My opinion is that 300 is a huge number, it is difficult to manage for 1 single marshal and a bunch of Captains to manage the entire league of 300. The member limit 160 seems to be just fine. Increasing that would kill the game and make a lot of people angry.


Even though there are Captains there will be players who would directly contact the Marshal and it makes it difficult for Marshal to come to the game to play and have fun as well and see 50-100 mails in his inbox.. 


Please share your views on this topic. One brain can only think to a limit with all your help maybe Plarium can think what is best for the game and not create more unhappy players again.
Please Like the Post if you agree or if it helps
UTC +6:00
1
IronApex Turok
16 October, 2016, 6:32 AM UTC

i agree, i already log in to 20+ mails a day. and thats with just 100ish members plus another 100ish in the training league. 


that being said, we do manage between both servers over 300 already.  and me and my team manage it fine. 



BUT.......


inflate that to 900 members?    if the game ever gets that many active at once. thats too much. 
UTC +0:00
0
exxxe
16 October, 2016, 6:33 AM UTC

lord many players suggested increasing the limit 



I'am me and that is what i care about :)
UTC +3:00
0
IronApex Turok
16 October, 2016, 6:50 AM UTC
to 300?!
UTC +0:00
0
Warrior
16 October, 2016, 8:29 AM UTC

exxxe said:


lord many players suggested increasing the limit 



can you help me with the thread or post that suggested cause i remember making a suggestion about Runes of Fealty and when i was answered that the league limit will be increased, there were a lot of players that did not want that to happen.


I suggest if you need my help to find the post where we (players of StormFall) rejected this, i woudl be glad to help in that.
Please Like the Post if you agree or if it helps
UTC +6:00
0
BiohazarD
Moderator
16 October, 2016, 9:02 AM UTC
I wouldn't mind a higher limit (maybe not 300 but 200-250).  If you want to have a smaller league it's not like you have to go that high, but it would be nice for us to be able to let in more players instead of having to turn them away just because we don't have space. 
Any opinions expressed by me are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of or constitute official statements by Plarium.
UTC +0:00
0
sison
16 October, 2016, 10:43 AM UTC
yes i am afraid also that 300 members can be something very big to manage it 
UTC +0:00
0
Warrior
16 October, 2016, 12:30 PM UTC

BiohazarD said:


I wouldn't mind a higher limit (maybe not 300 but 200-250).  If you want to have a smaller league it's not like you have to go that high, but it would be nice for us to be able to let in more players instead of having to turn them away just because we don't have space. 

i totally agree on the part of not being able let in more players because of space crunch but at the same time being a Captain in a league and understanding what the Marshal needs to go through i also would never suggest to get the league limit to 300. At time same time imagine a league of 300 Alt account that could create a ruckus and inconvenience.


I am trying to see this from all views and experiences of the game. Also i agree 200 could be more than enough even though 160 is still a lot.
Please Like the Post if you agree or if it helps
UTC +6:00
0
Gadheras
16 October, 2016, 1:02 PM UTC

How about not just give us a proper alliance system, where an alliance can defend and take becons together. Its easier to have a few smaller leagues into an alliance to manage than have a huge single league.



UTC +2:00
2
Snowgoon
16 October, 2016, 4:14 PM UTC

If this is true then it is another knee-jerk reaction to the devastation on other beacon maps caused by mega-coiners. They think twice as many defenders will make the beacons safer
but this would only help the top leagues, and would widen the gulf between them and us.



This is Total Domination on this server - http://prntscr.com/cttfsn

We have already seen Stormfall map at kabam, but they tried to blame kabam for this
http://plarium.com/forum/en/stormfall-age-of-war/game-discussion/29149_i-just-seen-a-glimpse-of-our-future---

Total Domination has always been one of their top titles, so if it can happen to them on plarium's own server then it can happen to us too.

Limiting the size of top leagues is the only thing that keeps this game going - Huge top leagues would kill this game faster than level 32 dragons

Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way - Pink Floyd - http://prnt.sc/dv923b
UTC +0:00
1
IronApex Turok
16 October, 2016, 11:22 PM UTC
imagine getting the top 300 active players into one league. the games done. 
UTC +0:00
0
Kjkl
17 October, 2016, 1:06 AM UTC
exxxe said:

lord many players suggested increasing the limit 



Maybe, but from same league. I did not see many leagues that have over 150 members. I do not think there is any league positioned on 20+ that have over 150 members.
Kjkl
UTC +1:00
0
roadstar Pitbull
17 October, 2016, 2:04 AM UTC
IronApex Turok said:

imagine getting the top 300 active players into one league. the games done. 
Or get all active in a league,, should only need, what 5 leagues,,,,maybe 6.
UTC +0:00
0
Lady Nerium KT-S2
17 October, 2016, 2:09 AM UTC
I agree that a few more members might be nice, but not 300. The logistics of managing that many people... not something I would want to take on, not if I wanted to actually play at some point. Most of the top leagues don't have the full amount of players that they could anyway, so what's the point?  I would bet that any of them could drop a few inactive players if they needed to make room for new ones.
I think, therefore I game.
UTC +5:00
0
Oracle
17 October, 2016, 7:12 AM UTC
300 is too small it should be 10K, these way we will rid of factional league, and there will be one league under 1 banner. 1 league having 1000 to 10 000 players is the best way to go, and the best way to kill the imbalance, and inactivity in the game. plus it will make beacon more controlable, 
Biohazard has killed the forum.
UTC +2:00
2
IronApex Turok
17 October, 2016, 7:50 AM UTC
maybe we all revolt and fight oberon?
UTC +0:00
2
exxxe
17 October, 2016, 8:00 AM UTC

lords increasing the limit would actually be a good thing 

however we are not sure if it is 300 or not and im sure that increasing that much is unlikely 


plarium will not suddenly change its mind to increase the max from a 160 to 300 lol that is a 140 increase it is nearly as good as merging two 

leagues into one which does not make any sense 


what will make sense is increasing it by no more than 10-50 (170-210)

I'am me and that is what i care about :)
UTC +3:00
0
Oracle
17 October, 2016, 8:16 AM UTC
IronApex Turok said:

maybe we all revolt and fight oberon?
How do you do that, The coward is hiding in a buble
Biohazard has killed the forum.
UTC +2:00
2
Oracle
17 October, 2016, 8:18 AM UTC
exxxe said:

lords increasing the limit would actually be a good thing 

however we are not sure if it is 300 or not and im sure that increasing that much is unlikely 


plarium will not suddenly change its mind to increase the max from a 160 to 300 lol that is a 140 increase it is nearly as good as merging two 

leagues into one which does not make any sense 


what will make sense is increasing it by no more than 10-50 (170-210)

For once I agree with you. IT seem there is still hope for you, you can still se the light mate, good for you, A bells for you mate
Biohazard has killed the forum.
UTC +2:00
0
IronApex Turok
17 October, 2016, 8:40 AM UTC
exxxe said:



plarium will not suddenly change its mind to increase the max from a 160 to 300 lol that is a 140 increase it is nearly as good as merging two 

leagues into one which does not make any sense 


what will make sense is increasing it by no more than 10-50 (170-210)

no, they wouldnt increase lost arts bonus by 400% either would they......?
UTC +0:00
0
1777561 users registered; 48013 topics; 285934 posts; our newest member:pobuda