DO YOU WANT BEACONS?? PLEASE CONTACT EMPERORS :)

59 Replies
Sarah Walker
12 September, 2016, 9:06 AM UTC

oh nice , now everyone will believe you are right haha


dont forget i was in the UC meetings too i saw how you used anarchy to get what you wanted then threw them to the wolves 


keep on twisting it about tho , your looking good 
UTC +0:00
mindful
12 September, 2016, 9:08 AM UTC

Sarah it is called flame wars when you twist words on forum and use argument to strengthen your game points. You do not need to point it out as something odd or bad. I feel unsure now if you know this is flame war since you find it to be strong points to equal it to someones vocal wrong sayings in the past in TS. 


I do notice your words '...where does it stop...'. That is my point all along. You contemplate the fate of your battle allies and try to muster more allies to fight for you.
UTC +0:00
Sarah Walker
12 September, 2016, 9:11 AM UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHGXwQeUk7M

UTC +0:00
Jezebel
12 September, 2016, 9:25 AM UTC

You seem to forget I was also at those UC meetings.  I don't understand why you are bringing Anarchy into this anyhow since you BAILED on them.

Also, anything that Anarchy did with the UC was voluntary they were not forced to do anything. 
UTC +0:00
Sarah Walker
12 September, 2016, 9:30 AM UTC

yep but i was willing to fight for them unlike some who left them out to dry 


oh and get this chubby checker , before you twist anarchy into this , i was not bringing them into it i was stating a fact 
UTC +0:00
Jezebel
12 September, 2016, 9:30 AM UTC

This one's for you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDIaDS9HhMw

UTC +0:00
Sarah Walker
12 September, 2016, 9:34 AM UTC
nice , at least your not trying to twist it about and directing it at me , well done  first honest answer ive seen 
UTC +0:00
Jezebel
12 September, 2016, 9:34 AM UTC
Sarah Walker said:

yep but i was willing to fight for them unlike some who left them out to dry 


oh and get this chubby checker , before you twist anarchy into this , i was not bringing them into it i was stating a fact 
The fact that you jumped ship would indicate otherwise (re: willing to fight for them) as for leaving them out to dry I really don't understand that statement.
UTC +0:00
Sarah Walker
12 September, 2016, 9:41 AM UTC

i wish i had time to explain but you will only manipulate and twist it all about to make yourselves look better anyway 


your just not worth the time and effort , but hey ive really enjoyed our chat 


and maybe this was more fitting than cry baby https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIikqPmbgvI

UTC +0:00
Jezebel
12 September, 2016, 9:42 AM UTC
yup that one suits you perfectly .... cheers!!
UTC +0:00
loringer1
12 September, 2016, 9:51 AM UTC
yeah but come on , chubby checker was excellent too 
UTC +1:00
Roftie
12 September, 2016, 2:52 PM UTC

BiohazarD said:


roftie said:


Emperor Shin said:

......................................................
......................................................
.......................................................

Lol you talk to much!

You propose exactly what Destiny has done the last 2 days.

They just didnt ask who wants it.

Just left it to the up and coming league to make it theirs.

You really are a one show pony.

Talk talk talk is all you do.

When have you ever done anything yourself??


I think his stats speak for themselves. He's killed about 2.5 million worth of enemy troops while attacking, and 5 million while defending.  In 2 years of gameplay. 



Oh and I should point out that shin's statement about emperors having a custom logo appears to be false. 
Yes but what about his main account after all every-one knows this is just his alt.
Thing is I notice he doesnt even answer any of my Q's ....... is it a sign that he accepts what I said or is he just scared to be proven wrong........AGAIN!?
There is a saying "empty cans make the loudest noise"  and shin I think that saing fits your profile perfectly!! 

UTC +0:00
thefray
12 September, 2016, 5:22 PM UTC

Sarah Walker said:


I am not trying to cause any wars I am just stating the fact that you guys are going round the emps allies taking out beacons , where does it stop , As usual destiny tries to twist everything anybody says around to make themselves look better , Anyone whos been around for a while knows how you have a fine art of manipulating comments and telling fibs to suit your needs 

just like how you accused anarchy of hitting a beacon when you was all in the anarchy teamspeak , didnt happen and was proved wrong with screenshots 


Ok no twist,



Did the Emps hit Destiny allies beacons YES

Did the Emps hit Destiny beacons NO!!!!

Did Destiny hit allies of Emps YES (some ally some League Family)

Were the Emps at the time of beacon hits Unforgiven Emperors YES!!!!!!! Do their league statements say we are a family of 6 leagues YES

Do they then get to drop their name and expect no retaliation, well I guess they can think that but that didn't happen did it.


Can we change our name to Unforgiven Destiny and then Emperors wouldn't want to war with us, probably not but I guarntee we will not put that to the test, we are Destiny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Did the Unforgivens support Emperors and give up their flag to them in prior event to make them stronger for upcoming war YES


Maybe someone still has the mail from Simmons stating such.


Did the unforgivens take the old Emps beacons to help out and probably planned to return them after the war Unknown but probable



Do we still have beacons YES

Do you NO

No fancy words, no twisting just pure facts.

Can you kill our beacons, YES will you lose a ton of troops YES (the only question is can you kill them all?)

Did you captain Shin come to the UC and ask for an alliance so he could have the NW corner beacons YES

Did he then come out and state you didn't want beacons in his next breath when the alliance didn't pan out   YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


We all see our own side of things and support our own decisions above are facts nothing more nothing less.

UTC +0:00
mindful
12 September, 2016, 5:33 PM UTC
TheFray. You are an amazing flame warrior.
UTC +0:00
Sarah Walker
12 September, 2016, 8:31 PM UTC

the best thing is you are making it out like its just destiny vs the emps and the emps hit destinys allies << classic twist to hit the smaller league and allies of the emps 


the real fact is it was the UC not destiny , the UC is made up of all your allied leagues , so making out we hit destiny allies to get at destiny is total rubbish , we hit the UC and obviously you are all allies because your all part of the UC , 



UTC +0:00
djmoody
13 September, 2016, 12:03 AM UTC

Sarah Walker said:


the best thing is you are making it out like its just destiny vs the emps and the emps hit destinys allies << classic twist to hit the smaller league and allies of the emps 


the real fact is it was the UC not destiny , the UC is made up of all your allied leagues , so making out we hit destiny allies to get at destiny is total rubbish , we hit the UC and obviously you are all allies because your all part of the UC , 



Well just for you Sara, Shin has explained directly to me in hours of TS convo his motivations. 

- Test and Shin don't like each other on a personal level because of the breakdown in diplo between them

- Shin holds Test accountable for the breakdown of the SW corner beacon support agreement we had with you

- Destiny killed 150m of Emp def on the NW beacons at beacon spawn

- Destiny foreably kicked you out of 2 of your own beacons in the NE a couple of days later

Apparently KoK's only crime was to be involved in the NW corner hits on Knights. And Elite was seen as hostile because it held beacon 407 afterwards. The irony of that being they were holding it for GOA and had been pushing for at least a month maybe 2 before this war started for GoA to take if off them.

On the flip side KoK gets credit for helping Unforgivens by:

- Being a large part of offering you ally status with UC at the start of the year

- Brokering a deal with Venom that could have ended tension with GoA/KoC and set Emps up as a major edge beacon holding league (the one that Test and Shin later messed up)

- Calling KT to a meeting to clear set out what was going on in the SW corner and ensuring it only went ahead with their blessing

- Trying hard to sort out that deal when it started going south

- For goodwill from the failing agreement offering that KoK would help you secure new beacons in front of your territory on new spawn

- Being the driving force behind getting you the NAP you decided not to be part of in the end

- Being a large part of trying to maintain the NAP with the other Unforgivens when you dropped out

- Actually defending Shin in UC meeting when everyone else is bad mouthing him for being an untrustworthy snake

- Getting Shin's plan infront of the UC to try and avoid this war

Quite a few of those points are actually things I have done for you guys personally.

So yes when KoK was the first to get attacked by your stupid coined hammer it annoyed the hell out of me, as it was a stab in the back to me personally and everything I had done. That someone wanted to spend $50k just to ruin my game for virtually no reason other than they hated my ally - not cool.

Anyway I will take my leave now as that is quite a lot of facts to digest all at once.

Everyone has a right to an opinion. No one has a right to their opinion being respected by other if it can't be backed up with rational and logic explanation
UTC +0:00
thefray
13 September, 2016, 1:44 AM UTC

Sarah Walker said:


the best thing is you are making it out like its just destiny vs the emps and the emps hit destinys allies << classic twist to hit the smaller league and allies of the emps 


the real fact is it was the UC not destiny , the UC is made up of all your allied leagues , so making out we hit destiny allies to get at destiny is total rubbish , we hit the UC and obviously you are all allies because your all part of the UC , 



OK


You hit UC because we are all allies.

We hit Unforgivin because you are all an allied family

Blue Magic (their allies) got involved and got hit


Sorry we couldn't find any Emperors beacons to hit for some reason, we searched and searched but didn't see any.


So do we now agree now that we said the same thing differently?

UTC +0:00
thefray
13 September, 2016, 1:59 AM UTC
Red said:

bormir said:


I would like to start by saying i am not taking part in this confilct, its fun to watch though. I have a question, if everything goes Emperors way, they win this war, they give growing leagues beacons, there is no more this Coralition, what is next? You are saying "we are an offensive league, we build offense, we smash beacons", who you gonna target then? Wont it be the leagues you gave beacons earlier as those will be the strongest leagues? Dont get me wrong from what i read so far Coralition isnt much better, if it is at all. But your Robin Hood like behavior is an effect of them not sharing their power with you, is it not?

To answer your question, when not at war, Emperors are primarily an aggressive PvP league.  We hit player castles, hamlets, and fortresses.  That is part of the reason for the conflict with Coralition.  They did not like our style of leave beacons alone but everything else is fair game.

Did I hear the Emperors hit some small leagues out of beacons for points in the beacon conquest, were they at war and we miss it or did these new leagues get deemed not worthy to hold those beacons and get VETO'd
UTC +0:00
Thedevilsson
13 September, 2016, 2:06 AM UTC

What test says is true! He offered my league beacon 338, almost completely for free. 


I mean 25 million softening blow, that is nothing right? A bargain if you think about it.


UTC +4:00
Jezebel
13 September, 2016, 4:17 AM UTC
Thedevilsson said:

What test says is true! He offered my league beacon 338, almost completely for free. 


I mean 25 million softening blow, that is nothing right? A bargain if you think about it.


Yup when you consider taking down a hostile beacon would cost you a lot more that is a bargain :)
UTC +0:00
1723466 users registered; 42956 topics; 270700 posts; our newest member:lebedzadunay