Best BG payouts

28 Replies
Vladimir Stojanovic
17 May, 2016, 2:00 PM UTC

Lord and Ladies, do not be shy, show us your best battleground payout


to break the ice I'll start first


UTC +2:00
0
Gadheras
17 May, 2016, 5:58 PM UTC

and how much profit did you gain on that?



UTC +2:00
0
Vladimir Stojanovic
17 May, 2016, 6:17 PM UTC

A lot, my Lord

UTC +2:00
0
Gadheras
17 May, 2016, 6:24 PM UTC

Vladimir Stojanovic said:


A lot, my Lord


So how many dragons did it cost you to get those dragons? Resource for Resource. Everyone can flash a nice looking reward, but it would be much nicer to see the cost it took to achieve it too. I talk to people ingame that burned a lot of units and got bumpkis back. 



UTC +2:00
0
Vladimir Stojanovic
17 May, 2016, 6:28 PM UTC
0 Dragons and 0 Necros my Lord. Im sorry but for battleground approach you need to find it yourself
UTC +2:00
0
Gadheras
17 May, 2016, 6:34 PM UTC

Vladimir Stojanovic said:


0 Dragons and 0 Necros my Lord. Im sorry but for battleground approach you need to find it yourself


Okay, so lets do it very simple then...


How much resources did you burn to get that reward. I'm not asking you about how to do BG's. I boarded the train with a lot of other players that just stopped do them people people found themselfs burning a lot of units for no gain what so ever. so I ask again, how much resources did it cost to you achieve that.


People that use to do BG's of any notority tend to use spreadsheets and such to keep tabs of how much resources they bank etc. So... if yuo got some sort of track of what you doing, it should be easy to answer right?


UTC +2:00
1
Drogar61
17 May, 2016, 8:06 PM UTC

Doesn't matter does Vladimir has  evidence or not, only way to get payout on this level is to spend about 208M of resources. He got about 194M.

So math is so simple. Also, spending number is at least, so he could spend more than 208M.

To easy understanding of this dialog, 208M resources is about 8554 Dragons. He got 7983.

Nice profit!

UTC +0:00
1
Gadheras
17 May, 2016, 8:13 PM UTC

Drogar61 said:


Doesn't matter does Vladimir has  evidence or not, only way to get payout on this level is to spend about 208M of resources. He got about 194M.

So math is so simple. Also, spending number is at least, so he could spend more than 208M.

To easy understanding of this dialog, 208M resources is about 8554 Dragons. He got 7983.

Nice profit!

Thank you...



I guess its hard to give a simple answer when you a company man :p

@ Plarium - Where is the nice reward when you end up with resource loss?

UTC +2:00
0
cat in the hat
17 May, 2016, 8:46 PM UTC

Everyone want to know about how much resources  it took to get reward. I would rather know how much total off you put in the bgs to get reward and the reward total off. It dont matter much on the resources banked for reward. As the game is near balanced on unit to off points of each unit.


PS I seen interesting post on Stormfalls age of war Facebook page. Something about adding a better unit to fight against in bgs. Is this going to make each bg more difficult to do? I dont see bgs as a profit for the people playing game. The people I know who spent money on bgs are wasting money. You can good units on unit sale than wasting money on bad units to get good units in bgs. Only thing i see worth doing bgs is to use bad units made to get the payouts to reduce food consumption. Also for skull runes and hero equipment. If Plarium makes bgs harder than there is almost no point to do them for hero equipment and skull runes. It would be only from Plarium to profit of people to do bgs to get these items and make people leave game. Leading to a dead community.
UTC +6:00
0
Gadheras
17 May, 2016, 8:59 PM UTC

tomspatchek said:


Everyone want to know about how much resources  it took to get reward. I would rather know how much total off you put in the bgs to get reward and the reward total off. It dont matter much on the resources banked for reward. As the game is near balanced on unit to off points of each unit.


PS I seen interesting post on Stormfalls age of war Facebook page. Something about adding a better unit to fight against in bgs. Is this going to make each bg more difficult to do? I dont see bgs as a profit for the people playing game. The people I know who spent money on bgs are wasting money. You can good units on unit sale than wasting money on bad units to get good units in bgs. Only thing i see worth doing bgs is to use bad units made to get the payouts to reduce food consumption. Also for skull runes and hero equipment. If Plarium makes bgs harder than there is almost no point to do them for hero equipment and skull runes. It would be only from Plarium to profit of people to do bgs to get these items and make people leave game. Leading to a dead community.


The profit I speak of is "resources spent vs resources gained" Units cost resources. People spending cash on buy units to throw into BG's should get a mental examination.


If I spend x days build units to use on BG's and get units back that is far less than I spent. Then I'm a fool for doing the BG in the first place. 


Profit would be get more units back than what you invested into it, so you gain days. Get it?


When I play more typical mmo's and go raid. I invest x time into make the raid happen and get fat loot for the time I invested. In Stormfall you invest time and effort and get a foot up your arse as reward to put it blunt.



UTC +2:00
1
cat in the hat
17 May, 2016, 9:18 PM UTC
Gadheras said:

tomspatchek said:


Everyone want to know about how much resources  it took to get reward. I would rather know how much total off you put in the bgs to get reward and the reward total off. It dont matter much on the resources banked for reward. As the game is near balanced on unit to off points of each unit.


PS I seen interesting post on Stormfalls age of war Facebook page. Something about adding a better unit to fight against in bgs. Is this going to make each bg more difficult to do? I dont see bgs as a profit for the people playing game. The people I know who spent money on bgs are wasting money. You can good units on unit sale than wasting money on bad units to get good units in bgs. Only thing i see worth doing bgs is to use bad units made to get the payouts to reduce food consumption. Also for skull runes and hero equipment. If Plarium makes bgs harder than there is almost no point to do them for hero equipment and skull runes. It would be only from Plarium to profit of people to do bgs to get these items and make people leave game. Leading to a dead community.


The profit I speak of is "resources spent vs resources gained" Units cost resources. People spending cash on buy units to throw into BG's should get a mental examination.


If I spend x days build units to use on BG's and get units back that is far less than I spent. Then I'm a fool for doing the BG in the first place. 


Profit would be get more units back than what you invested into it, so you gain days. Get it?


When I play more typical mmo's and go raid. I invest x time into make the raid happen and get fat loot for the time I invested. In Stormfall you invest time and effort and get a foot up your arse as reward to put it blunt.


Yes it is almost the same thing as "resources spent vs resources gained". If you add the off or def put in to bgs it would almost add the same as the resources. Then figure out the payout based on off or def for reward. Thats how i do it and is much easier to do IMO. There are only a few units you can take advantage on for the bank resources and not difficult to figure out. I think people using a spreadsheet is wasting there time to figure out there bank resources.

UTC +6:00
0
ion
18 May, 2016, 1:32 AM UTC

So, i need to make 8554 dragons first* 3 h 30 min = 29939 hours = 1247 days =3 years and something, but after that i will take a nice reward

 or spending 208 mil resources (that means about a year ) without losing a unit this time . But i dont have a BG level 117 , to 


reach level 117 you'll need to spend more resources , cause everytime you'll get less than you spend

Nice reward anyway, in 3 years i will post a similar one
aaa
UTC +0:00
0
jumy
18 May, 2016, 3:46 AM UTC

it is quite clear that there are people who, 

option 1 spend 1k euro a week

option 2  they have free sapphires


take your pick, but considers that they are always informed about incoming tournaments

enough  take the piss people

The truth hurts
UTC +12:00
0
securitas04
18 May, 2016, 1:16 PM UTC

A week ago I started playing. I got one dragon from a valar achievement. I did some BGs and now I have 50 dragons and 14 Eldritch dragons. By the end of the month I want to get to 100 total dragons and by the end of the year 1000. The BG algorithm may allow me to do this more easily than just dumping 1000 dragons into one battle and then getting 2000. I usually try to do BGs as part of an event so that I get additional bonus units and experience as well. Actually making a lot of smart choices may beat trying to be a high roller. Good luck!

UTC +5:00
0
Sifr
18 May, 2016, 1:28 PM UTC
I'm just dumping those pikemen and paladins I got from rewards to BG. Very very slow process but at least got a total of 800 or so warlocks and 300 or so demons. Not a fan of bg really. 
Fighter Sifr of Fellowship
UTC +0:00
1
Vladimir Stojanovic
18 May, 2016, 7:02 PM UTC

Sifr said:


I'm just dumping those pikemen and paladins I got from rewards to BG. Very very slow process but at least got a total of 800 or so warlocks and 300 or so demons. Not a fan of bg really. 
My Lord, why do you use Pikeman and Paladins on battlegrounds, that is wrong approach
UTC +2:00
0
Tetix
18 May, 2016, 10:53 PM UTC
Vladimir Stojanovic said:

My Lord, why do you use Pikeman and Paladins on battlegrounds, that is wrong approach

My Lord, what is the correct approach? Where would you use those thousands of infantry built ? Or which units do you use instead for battlegrounds ?
UTC +3:00
1
Sifr
19 May, 2016, 12:24 AM UTC

Vladimir Stojanovic said:


0 Dragons and 0 Necros my Lord. Im sorry but for battleground approach you need to find it yourself
My Lord, why do you use Pikeman and Paladins on battlegrounds, that is wrong approach

...

...

...


Guess I should have used my eldritch dragons and eldritch necros eh?

Fighter Sifr of Fellowship
UTC +0:00
0
Jezebel
19 May, 2016, 1:09 AM UTC

Forget the BG payouts we all know it costs more than we gain.  But I am interested in this http://prntscr.com/b5qwpe


Why is it that Facebook gets announcements and we don't and what are the changes you are making to BG now?


Here's a suggestion but it's a bit of a stretch...fix the game it's been terrible since the log in issues a couple weeks ago.  Major lag is interfering in the game play.  Stop making changes until you can actually provide a server that runs efficiently.

UTC +0:00
1
djmoody
19 May, 2016, 2:34 AM UTC
Tetix said:

Vladimir Stojanovic said:

My Lord, why do you use Pikeman and Paladins on battlegrounds, that is wrong approach

My Lord, what is the correct approach? Where would you use those thousands of infantry built ? Or which units do you use instead for battlegrounds ?
Pathfinders, Reavers, Chimera - the uber loading troops - assuming you raid enough to produce them 24/7. 50% more army power per month when converted in BG's (b4 any BG tax).
Everyone has a right to an opinion. No one has a right to their opinion being respected by other if it can't be backed up with rational and logic explanation
UTC +0:00
2
1775968 users registered; 47844 topics; 285669 posts; our newest member:aboubakadiaby3