HOB and Lost Souls not as Strong as they look.

8 Replies
Corey Hammack
3 November, 2016, 3:02 PM UTC
Yes HOB and Lost Souls have many pans but as you see Outlaws coalition and others take their pans down for fun every week. They have so many pans that their defense is so stretched out that they can not defend them properly.  I am more afraid of a coalition that is strong and has 3 pans verses one and has 20!!!
Corey
UTC +0:00
Vodkaonice
4 November, 2016, 8:23 AM UTC
thank you for this information ....
UTC +1:00
Wy San Luis
4 November, 2016, 11:01 AM UTC
Corey Hammack said:

Yes HOB and Lost Souls have many pans but as you see Outlaws coalition and others take their pans down for fun every week. They have so many pans that their defense is so stretched out that they can not defend them properly.  I am more afraid of a coalition that is strong and has 3 pans verses one and has 20!!!
Well you and your coa can try to take all of their pans if you like. It won't be a problem if they're not that strong and they can't defend their pans properly as you said. We will enjoy to see the screenshots.
"Those who seek to die will live, and those who seek to live will die."
UTC +0:00
Corey Hammack
4 November, 2016, 11:34 AM UTC
We have no interest in holding pans...Pans are a headache and in my opinion, are over rated!!
Corey
UTC +0:00
DoubleEdgedSword
4 November, 2016, 2:00 PM UTC

the point is not that if we take them all down, not intrested in holding pans anyway


the point is that most of the top 10 coalations find themself "allpowerfull" and 'omnipotent" but aren't^

we have proven that over and over again, plus, little note, we play differently then many others do, granting us to portrey our power by fighting and not by holding pans, showing our power in battle an dso far proving we, a small coalation witn not that many gamers, are way stronger then some of them are


yes they are strong, no doubt but they aren't as powerfull as they portray themselfs, most of them are powerfull but thx to the pans and overreaching/stretching themselfs they make themself very weak


its what corey says: the once to fear are the once who have very little pans and so, they have more troops situated in one point, instead of spreding it all over 20 different points (vodkaonice, you know what i speak of, we talked about this before ingame ^^ )

i dare to say this becouse i have been in this situation, before i joined the coalation i'm now in, i was members of DEATH.inc (for more then a year) but the coalation overreached itself, became greedy and wanted to abotain to much with to little and when war came, they fell, like domino's

the point is that ranks and area controled don't neccesary say much about your strength

hope yall understand now

regards DES, hegmemnon of OUTLAWS

(long live outlaws !! )





Sic Semper Tyrannis
UTC +0:00
Teofilo Gatmaitan
4 November, 2016, 4:06 PM UTC

DoubleEdgedSword said:


the point is that most of the top 10 coalations find themself "allpowerfull" and 'omnipotent" but aren't


yes they are strong, no doubt but they aren't as powerfull as they portray themselfs, most of them are powerfull but thx to the pans and overreaching/stretching themselfs they make themself very weak


its what corey says: the once to fear are the once who have very little pans and so, they have more troops situated in one point, instead of spreding it all over 20 different points (vodkaonice, you know what i speak of, we talked about this before ingame ^^ )

I was really amazed by you outlaws. I thought that the reason you're able to take down their pans is because you're strong even though you're smaller and newer compared to top coas. But now you made it clear that their pans fell because the troops defending them is just a very small portion of their total defense.

hope yall understand now

Yup. Thanks for clarification. Much clearer now.

UTC +0:00
DoubleEdgedSword
4 November, 2016, 4:30 PM UTC

nice way to twist and turn my words

nicely done

do not forget the little side note: we are stronger then most and have proven that over and over again, i just tought it wouldn't be needed to repeat myself over that, but ok, i added it in, for your pleasure ;)

i don't like bragging, so don't make me repeat it more then people want to hear it

arronganc eis also a reason why big coalation fall you know ;)




Sic Semper Tyrannis
UTC +0:00
Qojy
5 November, 2016, 8:43 AM UTC

Most people who say they're not interested in Pans are the ones unable to hold even one.

As for Corey : You're wrong, these top coas are way bigger than you think and they all have sub coas to help in times of war.

I've seen Association try to bash Terminators > they failed in the end.

Outlaws has taken a few Lost Souls Pans but they have all been retaken by sub coas.

As for HOB it takes 5 coas to take 1 of their pans.

Even Kracken is stronger than ever despite all the BoK attacks that happened months ago.

Death inc was the exception because they had way too much pans, but even then it required a bunch of coas from NWO to take them down.



UTC +1:00
Eyynar
24 November, 2016, 1:05 PM UTC

For sure,

most of the top 10 ranked Coalitions are not weak, they are or they had been good organization, i think thats a fact.

But DES is also right in a way. 

The Ranking does not say anything about strongness, you get to much influence holding pans compared to Capitol, Achievements etc.

If you take a look on Achivements, you see some highranked Coas with no warexperience (low achievements)

To evaluate whit whom you are battle with, you should study the weekly statistics for a while.

And of course, money is an key issue, but in my opinion is a good analyzation and strategy very important as well. This helps you to reduce money investment.


UTC +2:00
1667599 users registered; 34023 topics; 253969 posts; our newest member:ibra.ali.313