Too many MC's own by some combines

31 Reply
Mehnslayer
22 November, 2015, 1:35 AM UTC

I would have to agree with Volfan on this topic unfortunately,

Another aspect is, if every combine holds 2-3 MCs... What do you do? MCs are a much needed mechanic in terms of strategy otherwise it is just people throwing armies at each other.

E 'n la sua volontade è nostra pace
UTC +10:00
Chris
23 November, 2015, 7:01 PM UTC
 some Players who are posting messages here on this topic are not  are not reading between the lines the game has become boring for some and its mainly to do with MC"s   from what I have heard from a lot of players  that's why some have left the game and wont return  this is not a personnel attack on those with mc's  but more to do with making the game fun again so that players stay and keep playing the game
UTC +0:00
Chris
23 November, 2015, 7:26 PM UTC

oh Yes and this is the same Brain Trust that came up with Aliens and predators you give them some good ideas  on how to make the game more better and fun   and they take no notice  but yet they come up with crap like Aliens and predators  in a war  LOL no wonder players are leaving this game  Too many     ' MC"'s and Aliens and predators

 are turning people off '
UTC +0:00
Mehnslayer
23 November, 2015, 7:56 PM UTC
Although I agree that MC's are part of the "end game" content which can be shared with everyone and allow for everyone to grow at a quicker rate which in most cases is good because I strongly advocate the reduction of troop build time. I think that limiting a combine to a set amount of MC's would provide a reason for higher levels and bigger leagues a reason to leave, especially those that spend money. My combine plans for awhile on how and when to hit a MC so that we dont screw it up and although subjective, that is most of the fun for me.
E 'n la sua volontade è nostra pace
UTC +10:00
Abu_Kasap
23 November, 2015, 8:09 PM UTC

I see.

So, if every1 get a personal MC, that will keep ppl in game?

MC is ultimate goal to every combine. If u cannot organise yourself, to take and hold MC,  this isn't Plarium  problem.

I wonder, why ppl did not quit, when only 1 combine have all MC?

If, Plarium do that, what will prevent every1,  to make their own combines, and to get an MC ?

That will be fun - 1 person combines with an MC.
UTC +0:00
Daniel
12 January, 2016, 5:33 PM UTC

Main reason people is leaving this game is because its a game whose built in around the concept of 100 new players but out of those 1-3 will keep playing the game for years, this is how most browser games work trying to captivate the few rather then the masses, 

And this thread shows if anything that just handing over endgame stuff is not going to help its rather gonna conteract itself since it takes away much needed organisation ingame and teamwork both of which are a-z in keeping people active and wanting to play
FYI stand at my previous viewpoint surrounding the matter around the MC 

Duchion Axis Yoppta
UTC +0:00
John Black
Administrator
13 January, 2016, 12:24 PM UTC

This is a war game, Commander. So everyone should struggle for everything here. If someone gives up on the lower level, you will just use his base as a farm, this is a part of Gameplay. So nothing is pointless here, and each one’s contribution counts. 

UTC +3:00
rjjrmiller
23 January, 2016, 1:16 AM UTC

Combines who work hard a building MC's get to reap the rewards.

Should countries with powerful armed forces only be allowed 5 aircraft carriers max? Thats nonsense, hard work pays off!

UTC +5:00
John Black
Administrator
25 January, 2016, 7:52 AM UTC
rjjrmiller said:

Combines who work hard a building MC's get to reap the rewards.

Should countries with powerful armed forces only be allowed 5 aircraft carriers max? Thats nonsense, hard work pays off!

Exactly, Commander.
UTC +3:00
Omar Smith
21 July, 2016, 6:35 PM UTC
Theimdi said:

Sounds like socialism Chris. This is a war game. The ones with the bigger guns win. I don't think there should be any limiting. The overhead of keeping them will take care of it on it's own. Quit medling.
Couldn't agree with you more. Survival of the fittest. You already get free troops and resources. You want free dominance now?
This is Commander Smith of AREA 597. You are now in the custody of the most lethal F.O.B. on Zandian soil. Refusal to cooperate will be met with the appropriate level of force. You don't have the right to remain silent.
UTC +4:00
Omar Smith
21 July, 2016, 6:53 PM UTC
When I first started off playing this game and had a handful of troops with little in-game knowledge I started to expand my dominance. I got my [REDACTED] handed to me. I decided that I would grow first. Currently I have half the amount of territory that I had before and it is growing steadily. I had to earn my position. No one DESERVES any thing in game or in real life. You have to earn it. The combines at the top gained their positions by their own efforts. Even if you claim that they cheated their way to the top, the fact is they did something. Lets get a low lvl combine and give them 5 MC's when they can't even defend their own HQ or even their own base. Sounds logical. I've stated my opinion. Feel free to argue.
This is Commander Smith of AREA 597. You are now in the custody of the most lethal F.O.B. on Zandian soil. Refusal to cooperate will be met with the appropriate level of force. You don't have the right to remain silent.
UTC +4:00
RobertShatz
Moderator
21 July, 2016, 11:54 PM UTC
Omar Smith said:

When I first started off playing this game and had a handful of troops with little in-game knowledge I started to expand my dominance. I got my [REDACTED] handed to me. I decided that I would grow first. Currently I have half the amount of territory that I had before and it is growing steadily. I had to earn my position. No one DESERVES any thing in game or in real life. You have to earn it. The combines at the top gained their positions by their own efforts. Even if you claim that they cheated their way to the top, the fact is they did something. Lets get a low lvl combine and give them 5 MC's when they can't even defend their own HQ or even their own base. Sounds logical. I've stated my opinion. Feel free to argue.
Commander...Well said Sir
Robert Shatz
UTC +0:00
1665788 users registered; 33904 topics; 253523 posts; our newest member:carnal