Too many MC's own by some combines

31 Reply
Chris
11 September, 2015, 10:32 PM UTC

I think there should  be  a Limit too how many MC's are   in the hole game  there are far too many right  now

UTC +0:00
10
Shaun
11 September, 2015, 10:47 PM UTC
Good  idea  chris  I like  it means other have a chance as well  hope the game support does something about it
UTC +10:00
0
Jason
11 September, 2015, 10:52 PM UTC
great idea   hope they listen to you  on your  idea it makes  sense  to me  why would  anyone  need 38  Mining  complex's   or  even 10 mining complex  why just to collect dust  lol   good idea  mate  love  it
UTC +0:00
0
Dylan
11 September, 2015, 11:02 PM UTC
I agree  with  chris its a good idea  I like the bit  about  the  twist  1  been a safe  keeper  meaning if you  have  5 mc's  and someone tried to take one  and it was the protected MC  that  they would  straight  away lose all there units once  they  sent them off to take  it also   because  I think  you  should have the option   of  which of the 5   mc's   is to  be the  safe one   and when you get your very  first one it  should  be the protected  straight away  then  after you get your 2nd and 3rd and so on then you can chance  the protection from the 1st one  to either the 2nd or 3rd or even 5th   on it meaning others  wont know  which one of the 5 MC's   is a safeguarded   I love it   best idea I have read so far
UTC +0:00
3
GLADIATOR
11 September, 2015, 11:19 PM UTC
Maybe  chris  should  be on the  Game &  rules  committee  I like the idea   and also think Dylan's  idea  is very  good  too  as Dylan said  with a twist you have 5 mcs  how can anyone  know  which one is  protected by the game smart idea  and by able to keep changing  the protection  around from 1 to 5  I like it   example would  be a combine tries to take a mc  taken a gamble not  knowing   weather its  Mining Complex 1 to 5  they hit  MC 3  then get back a report  saying  units  lost  PVP  Points   lost  and maybe   Rankings  points  lost  it would chance the why the ladder looks at the moment  LOL 
UTC +0:00
1
Theimdi
12 September, 2015, 7:13 AM UTC
Sounds like socialism Chris. This is a war game. The ones with the bigger guns win. I don't think there should be any limiting. The overhead of keeping them will take care of it on it's own. Quit medling.
UTC +0:00
1
Chris
12 September, 2015, 10:39 AM UTC
Hey  Theimdi  looks like  more people here  like the idea
UTC +0:00
0
David Gibson
13 September, 2015, 12:50 AM UTC
its a great idea but we will kno who winning in the game in combine if everyone get 5 MC the lower who don't need will have that will not be fear to the aggressive players on here
UTC +0:00
1
Daniel
15 September, 2015, 4:17 PM UTC
The problem is that those combines who now owns those mc would be "cheated" and this wouldnt really work in the long run since that whould mean that the top combines could pour in Millions upon millions of def into the mcs sure a limit should exsist but 5 mc is to little but i agree that there should be a limit but based on the amount of exsisting mcs
Duchion Axis Yoppta
UTC +0:00
0
David Gibson
16 September, 2015, 6:06 PM UTC
yes the lower  combine can always get a merge with other low combines an take MC and keep it they just have too merge with 3 or more combines
UTC +0:00
0
John Black
28 September, 2015, 9:50 AM UTC

And I do not agree, Commander 
I remember some situations, when a coalition of small Combines won in battle with a really big Combine!

This is the strategy and we may not forget this 

UTC +3:00
2
Smitty503
17 October, 2015, 2:28 AM UTC
Let's do away with the Mines completely, after all they made it so rations don't count for your troops leaving you if you can't feed them and then they made it so 1 coiner can take a mine away from a entire combine so this game is now those who spend the most win everyone else loses.
UTC +0:00
2
Caminhante
18 October, 2015, 12:19 AM UTC

John Black said:


And I do not agree, Commander 
I remember some situations, when a coalition of small Combines won in battle with a really big Combine!

This is the strategy and we may not forget this 




yes, maybe we must keep the game spirit: : "unbalance is our name"


This is why many [ayers leave the game. It`s unbalanced since the begin when generals can to occupy seageant players.


Even bonuses boxes are small for small and medium combines. OR you jon a big combine or you must be happy with poor bonuses from combine contracts, even if you are a good player. 

All game structure bring players to few and concentrated combines. This is pretty obvious to collpase the game in medium time.

UTC +0:00
0
Abu_Kasap
20 October, 2015, 4:54 PM UTC

As i do not see any1 long-time player here.

Let me remind  you all, that no so long ago there was ONLY 3 combines holding an MC.

And 1 was actually a training ground.

Now - a lot combines hold MC's

But, what i see here is a ppl, that just start to play and want to get an MC. With no or litlle efforts.

U need a long preparation or a LOT of money to get and hold MC.

No1 will give u MC just like that. No game will give u a global building, just because u start to play game.

Finish ALL your research and upgrades, start to make millions of O and D, then u start to look at MC's.



UTC +0:00
4
gsshanmukha
8 November, 2015, 2:37 PM UTC
HOW MANY TOTAL MINING COMPLEXES ARE THERE
UTC +5:00
0
fakeasnever
8 November, 2015, 2:51 PM UTC

@GSSHanMukha (8 November, 2015, 2:37 PM UTC):
150.

Also, please do not type in all capitals.

I am the best Quantum Cannon. There are many like me, but only I am the best.
UTC +0:00
0
Daniel
12 November, 2015, 7:56 AM UTC

I have writhen here before and i will yet agian ive played it since the days when there where only 3 combines owning all MCs and i sternly dissagrees that there should be a hinderance.

Reasoning why

1# As many said before yes u might find it unbalanced but dont u forget that those guys pay out of there pockets to get their units this aint a cheap thing to do 

2# limits to how many MCs would make those combines existing who have more MC lose them which aint really fair either i mean they do need to put stuff there

3# If this was implemented this game whould lose its pro players and those who stayed whould make it so MC owned by lets say Death Squad unconqerlble just do to the cheer amount of troops they can pour into defending the MC

4# This whould also serve as a way to increase the alts since it gives combines purpose to do so or spawn a ridicul amount of combines lets say it happens to Death squad again if there to own all those MC they whould hafto split upto about 7-9 Combines

5# Takes away the main reason MC exist to help decide whoose the strongest if u cap that u would need to remake the whole Ranking systems for combines since Dominance is based of the fact that a combine could i theory have all MCs

6# It whould punish those who fought day and night to get those MCs and then just get slapped in the face and lose some if they have to many or just how easy it would get to have a MC

7# And finally a noob combine is not to have all rights from the get go and bear in mind all combines have the possibility to acheive anything if they put down their will into it this should not be served on a silver plater to them since taking a MC is quite a achievement in its own right not a given right this is war people not some sunday equallity meeting or something of that sorts if u want it then u gotta fight to get it

(DISCLAIMER all my examples where not to commercelise or show any resentment towards combines or ideologys the examples they where just easier to use as is to enhance this text)

Yours Truly Daniel

PS Ive played for bout a year for those who wonder

Duchion Axis Yoppta
UTC +0:00
1
Naemonii
21 November, 2015, 8:24 PM UTC

Chris,


It's a game. It's a war game. it's not SUPPOSED to be fair. Combines with a lot of resources are put together by a lot of hard working game players. We build, build, upgrade and build and upgrade some more. That's part of the game and yes if that means building up MCs so be it. I am a proud member of Ghostwolves and those MCs were worked for..jus' sayin'


Have a fantastic PVP weekend :)
UTC +0:00
2
Falcon1313
21 November, 2015, 8:51 PM UTC

chris

you are in combine that cant gain new players and keep them growing and active for those combines that can you make rash statements against being in the combines that struggle daily with those little combines taking pot shots at the mines to score points off our hard built/won defence perhaps you need to look closer at the structure of your combine before you slate the leaders

UTC +0:00
2
VolFan18
21 November, 2015, 8:54 PM UTC
If we make this game like socialism, no one will want to play.  Why would I want to give MCs to those that can't take them or hold them and deprive those that pay a lot of money to make sure they can keep a lot of MCs?  I don't see plarium doing this at all since it would destroy their revenue and destroy the fun of the game for those that pay for it.
UTC +0:00
1
1780990 users registered; 48439 topics; 287421 post; our newest member:grountinos