This issue has already been dealt with back in the beta testing phase for 3v3, idk why it's been like this after implementing on the main servers. They've already dealt with this before, so I'm pretty sure this would be fixed pretty soon. 

At this point it’s a completely redundant game mode, I’ve fought 4 times since reset and I’m in the green because people can’t win 3 battles against my defence so I keep on gaining points.

What is the point of a game mode you don’t have to fight in and for which there are no immediate rewards?

There is literally no point in me playing it currently as whenever I attack anyone I lose more then I gain as it’s so even. I’m better off doi ng nothing.

Whoever came up with this system should be embarrassed 

According to Tag Team Arena's help section: "The first player to win 2 Battles wins the Series" and "Lose 2 or more Battles, and you'll and up losing". However, the reality can be quite different.

At various times I have come across players putting a very strong team and two other extremely weak teams to defend. That way, even when I win the Series, that defeat makes me lose a lot more points than I won with the victories.

In the end, there is no meaning in winning the Series, because if you are not victorious in the three Battles, you can still lose points.

The same result appears in my defense log. Those who fail to defeat my strongest team end up losing point.

This is the reason I pulled all my new arena teams.  Besides, I didnt like the format.  Any newbie or middle game player is at a huge disadvantage.  We dont have enough decent champs to field that many teams. 

Maybe because of several posts for tag team arena (from other and me) before it is launched, Plarium invented such point system. 

I post I played such tag team arena in many games before, everyone all set their teams as weakest fight their strongest, strongest fight mid team and mid team fight their weakest. 

praderajulio said:

According to Tag Team Arena's help section: "The first player to win 2 Battles wins the Series" and "Lose 2 or more Battles, and you'll and up losing". However, the reality can be quite different.

At various times I have come across players putting a very strong team and two other extremely weak teams to defend. That way, even when I win the Series, that defeat makes me lose a lot more points than I won with the victories.

In the end, there is no meaning in winning the Series, because if you are not victorious in the three Battles, you can still lose points.

The same result appears in my defense log. Those who fail to defeat my strongest team end up losing point.

So basically doing nothing is the best course of action? Interesting...

Points should've been rewarded as a whole series, not per fight. 

You win all point if you win 2, extra bonus points if you win all 3

For the loser is the same, lose points if you lose 2, lose more points if you lose all 3

This really should be fix asap because this can also work in the attackers favor and prone to be abuse.

Attack +15, and  just win 1 battle, intentionally lose the other 2 battles, you will still gain +5 points and since you lose 2 battles, the fight wil be tagged as defeat. This means you can attack that player repeatedly as long as you don't refresh your list. 

This is STUPID! I actually do way better if I don’t play?!??. I literally watch the other players in my group drop down below me because they play! Plarium, this is really bad! I’m not a genius by any means, but a game mode that de incentivizes game play seems like a questionable move... I really feel like this roll out needs a reboot, and all players deserve a reward, as an apology.